Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives

Abstract Savannas are commonly described as a vegetation type with a grass layer interspersed with a discontinuous tree or shrub layer. On the contrary, forbs, a plant life form that can include any nongraminoid herbaceous vascular plant, are poorly represented in definitions of savannas worldwide....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frances Siebert, Niels Dreber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5307
id doaj-3b5604c9c85d4a8f92046a83efc8b83f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b5604c9c85d4a8f92046a83efc8b83f2021-03-02T04:38:08ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582019-07-019137875789110.1002/ece3.5307Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectivesFrances Siebert0Niels Dreber1Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management North‐West University Potchefstroom South AfricaDepartment of Ecosystem Modelling, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology University of Göttingen Göttingen GermanyAbstract Savannas are commonly described as a vegetation type with a grass layer interspersed with a discontinuous tree or shrub layer. On the contrary, forbs, a plant life form that can include any nongraminoid herbaceous vascular plant, are poorly represented in definitions of savannas worldwide. While forbs have been acknowledged as a diverse component of the herbaceous layer in savanna ecosystems and valued for the ecosystem services and functions they provide, they have not been the primary focus in most savanna vegetation studies. We performed a systematic review of scientific literature to establish the extent to which forbs are implicitly or explicitly considered as a discrete vegetation component in savanna research. The overall aims were to summarize knowledge on forb ecology, identify knowledge gaps, and derive new perspectives for savanna research and management with a special focus on arid and semiarid ecosystems in Africa. We synthesize and discuss our findings in the context of different overarching research themes: (a) functional organization and spatial patterning, (b) land degradation and range management, (c) conservation and reserve management, (d) resource use and forage patterning, and (e) germination and recruitment. Our results revealed biases in published research with respect to study origin (country coverage in Africa), climate (more semiarid than arid systems), spatial scale (more local than landscape scale), the level at which responses or resource potential was analyzed (primarily plant functional groups rather than species), and the focus on interactions between life forms (rather seldom between forbs and grasses and/or trees). We conclude that the understanding of African savanna community responses to drivers of global environmental change requires knowledge beyond interactions between trees and grasses only and beyond the plant functional group level. Despite multifaceted evidence of our current understanding of forbs in dry savannas, there appear to be knowledge gaps, specifically in linking drivers of environmental change to forb community responses. We therefore propose that more attention be given to forbs as an additional ecologically important plant life form in the conventional tree–grass paradigm of savannas.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5307biodiversitybiomassdisturbanceforageherbaceous communityindicator
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frances Siebert
Niels Dreber
spellingShingle Frances Siebert
Niels Dreber
Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
Ecology and Evolution
biodiversity
biomass
disturbance
forage
herbaceous community
indicator
author_facet Frances Siebert
Niels Dreber
author_sort Frances Siebert
title Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
title_short Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
title_full Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
title_fullStr Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: Knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
title_sort forb ecology research in dry african savannas: knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Savannas are commonly described as a vegetation type with a grass layer interspersed with a discontinuous tree or shrub layer. On the contrary, forbs, a plant life form that can include any nongraminoid herbaceous vascular plant, are poorly represented in definitions of savannas worldwide. While forbs have been acknowledged as a diverse component of the herbaceous layer in savanna ecosystems and valued for the ecosystem services and functions they provide, they have not been the primary focus in most savanna vegetation studies. We performed a systematic review of scientific literature to establish the extent to which forbs are implicitly or explicitly considered as a discrete vegetation component in savanna research. The overall aims were to summarize knowledge on forb ecology, identify knowledge gaps, and derive new perspectives for savanna research and management with a special focus on arid and semiarid ecosystems in Africa. We synthesize and discuss our findings in the context of different overarching research themes: (a) functional organization and spatial patterning, (b) land degradation and range management, (c) conservation and reserve management, (d) resource use and forage patterning, and (e) germination and recruitment. Our results revealed biases in published research with respect to study origin (country coverage in Africa), climate (more semiarid than arid systems), spatial scale (more local than landscape scale), the level at which responses or resource potential was analyzed (primarily plant functional groups rather than species), and the focus on interactions between life forms (rather seldom between forbs and grasses and/or trees). We conclude that the understanding of African savanna community responses to drivers of global environmental change requires knowledge beyond interactions between trees and grasses only and beyond the plant functional group level. Despite multifaceted evidence of our current understanding of forbs in dry savannas, there appear to be knowledge gaps, specifically in linking drivers of environmental change to forb community responses. We therefore propose that more attention be given to forbs as an additional ecologically important plant life form in the conventional tree–grass paradigm of savannas.
topic biodiversity
biomass
disturbance
forage
herbaceous community
indicator
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5307
work_keys_str_mv AT francessiebert forbecologyresearchindryafricansavannasknowledgegapsandfutureperspectives
AT nielsdreber forbecologyresearchindryafricansavannasknowledgegapsandfutureperspectives
_version_ 1724243011335880704