Zn(II), Mn(II) and Sr(II) Behavior in a Natural Carbonate Reservoir System. Part II: Impact of Geological CO2 Storage Conditions

• Main Authors: Auffray B., Garcia B., Lienemann C.-P., Sorbier L., Cerepi A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: EDP Sciences 2016-07-01
• Series: Oil & Gas Science and Technology
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015043

Some key points still prevent the full development of geological carbon sequestration in underground formations, especially concerning the assessment of the integrity of such storage. Indeed, the consequences of gas injection on chemistry and petrophysical properties are still much discussed in the scientific community, and are still not well known at either laboratory or field scale. In this article, the results of an experimental study about the mobilization of Trace Elements (TE) during CO2 injection in a reservoir are presented. The experimental conditions range from typical storage formation conditions (90 bar, supercritical CO2) to shallower conditions (60 and 30 bar, CO2 as gas phase), and consider the dissolution of the two carbonates, coupled with the sorption of an initial concentration of 10−5 M of Zn(II), and the consequent release in solution of Mn(II) and Sr(II). The investigation goes beyond the sole behavior of TE in the storage conditions: it presents the specific behavior of each element with respect to the pressure and the natural carbonate considered, showing that different equilibrium concentrations are to be expected if a fluid with a given concentration of TE leaks to an upper formation. Even though sorption is evidenced, it does not balance the amount of TE released by the dissolution process. The increase in porosity is clearly evidenced as a linear function of the CO2 pressure imposed for the St-Emilion carbonate. For the Lavoux carbonate, this trend is not confirmed by the 90 bar experiment. A preferential dissolution of the bigger family of pores from the preexisting porosity is observed in one of the samples (Lavoux carbonate) while the second one (St-Emilion carbonate) presents a newly-formed family of pores. Both reacted samples evidence that the pore network evolves toward a tubular network type.