Global Gender Justice and Epistemic Oppression: A Response to an Epistemic Dilemma

• Main Author: Corwin Aragon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University of Western Ontario 2019-07-01
• Series: Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
• Subjects: epistemic injustice, epistemic oppression, structural injustice, structural responsibility, complicity, global gender justice
• Online Access: https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/7294

Critiques of Western feminists’ attempts to extend claims about gender injustice to the global context highlighted a dilemma facing Western feminists, what I call the global gender justice dilemma. In response to this dilemma, Alison M. Jaggar argues that Western feminists should turn our attention away from trying to resolve it and, instead, toward examination of our own complicity in the processes that produce injustice. I suggest that this kind of approach is helpful in responding to an additional dilemma that confronts the Western feminist, namely the epistemic dilemma. Western feminists can speak for women of the global South and run the risk of distorting those women’s experience and further silencing their voices, or we can refuse to speak and abdicate our responsibilities to address injustice. I argue that we should address this dilemma not by trying to resolve it but by examining our role in the reproduction of epistemically unjust practices. To explain this response, I offer a preliminary account of epistemic injustice as epistemic oppression. I conclude by claiming that our own epistemic complicity in epistemically oppressive social practices is a weighty reason for us to work to transform those practices.