Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion

Purpose. To compare 2 radiographic assessment methods for congenital talipes equinovarus: strapping the ankle with tapes versus dorsiflexion with a wooden block. Methods. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken with the ankle strapped by tapes or dorsiflexed by a wooden block. Talocalcane...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EHK Yeung, YH Li, ON Ng, W Chow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2005-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300307
id doaj-3b184d009bbe4046bfe8846ed7a1b462
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b184d009bbe4046bfe8846ed7a1b4622020-11-25T03:09:35ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902005-12-011310.1177/230949900501300307Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced DorsiflexionEHK YeungYH LiON NgW ChowPurpose. To compare 2 radiographic assessment methods for congenital talipes equinovarus: strapping the ankle with tapes versus dorsiflexion with a wooden block. Methods. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken with the ankle strapped by tapes or dorsiflexed by a wooden block. Talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles were measured and analysed. Results. 20 radiographic assessments were performed on 14 patients. From the anteroposterior view, the mean talocalcaneal angle with strapping was 19.4 degrees (range, 0–34.0; standard deviation [SD], 11.2 degrees). From the lateral view, the mean talocalcaneal angle with strapping was 22.0 degrees (range, 8.0–38.8; SD, 8.9 degrees) and with forced dorsiflexion was 21.0 degrees (range, 0–52.7; SD, 11.3 degrees), with a mean absolute difference of 9.4 degrees between the 2 groups. The mean tibiocalcaneal angle with strapping was 77.9 degrees (range, 43.2–120.0; SD, 18.8 degrees) and with forced dorsiflexion was 78.2 degrees (range, 29.5–134.0; SD, 24.7 degrees), with a mean absolute difference of 15.7 degrees between the 2 groups. The difference between the tibiocalcaneal measurements in the 2 groups was statistically significant (p=0.026). Conclusion. Similar results were obtained for talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles measured with strapping and forced dorsiflexion. However, the strapping method provides better stabilisation while radiographs are taken.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300307
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EHK Yeung
YH Li
ON Ng
W Chow
spellingShingle EHK Yeung
YH Li
ON Ng
W Chow
Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet EHK Yeung
YH Li
ON Ng
W Chow
author_sort EHK Yeung
title Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
title_short Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
title_full Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
title_fullStr Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic Assessment of Congenital Talipes Equinovarus: Strapping versus Forced Dorsiflexion
title_sort radiographic assessment of congenital talipes equinovarus: strapping versus forced dorsiflexion
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2005-12-01
description Purpose. To compare 2 radiographic assessment methods for congenital talipes equinovarus: strapping the ankle with tapes versus dorsiflexion with a wooden block. Methods. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken with the ankle strapped by tapes or dorsiflexed by a wooden block. Talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles were measured and analysed. Results. 20 radiographic assessments were performed on 14 patients. From the anteroposterior view, the mean talocalcaneal angle with strapping was 19.4 degrees (range, 0–34.0; standard deviation [SD], 11.2 degrees). From the lateral view, the mean talocalcaneal angle with strapping was 22.0 degrees (range, 8.0–38.8; SD, 8.9 degrees) and with forced dorsiflexion was 21.0 degrees (range, 0–52.7; SD, 11.3 degrees), with a mean absolute difference of 9.4 degrees between the 2 groups. The mean tibiocalcaneal angle with strapping was 77.9 degrees (range, 43.2–120.0; SD, 18.8 degrees) and with forced dorsiflexion was 78.2 degrees (range, 29.5–134.0; SD, 24.7 degrees), with a mean absolute difference of 15.7 degrees between the 2 groups. The difference between the tibiocalcaneal measurements in the 2 groups was statistically significant (p=0.026). Conclusion. Similar results were obtained for talocalcaneal and tibiocalcaneal angles measured with strapping and forced dorsiflexion. However, the strapping method provides better stabilisation while radiographs are taken.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300307
work_keys_str_mv AT ehkyeung radiographicassessmentofcongenitaltalipesequinovarusstrappingversusforceddorsiflexion
AT yhli radiographicassessmentofcongenitaltalipesequinovarusstrappingversusforceddorsiflexion
AT onng radiographicassessmentofcongenitaltalipesequinovarusstrappingversusforceddorsiflexion
AT wchow radiographicassessmentofcongenitaltalipesequinovarusstrappingversusforceddorsiflexion
_version_ 1724661755653652480