A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets

In the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Feng, Yan Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-07-01
Series:Big Earth Data
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627
id doaj-3aef98fc2e994af0b4ba08dca4d0428f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3aef98fc2e994af0b4ba08dca4d0428f2020-11-25T01:47:55ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBig Earth Data2096-44712574-54172019-07-013319121910.1080/20964471.2019.16636271663627A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasetsMin Feng0Yan Bai1Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesIn the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accuracy of global land cover mapping by fusing the existing datasets. A decision-fuse method was developed based on fuzzy logic to quantify the consistencies and uncertainties of the existing datasets and then aggregated to provide the most certain estimation. The method was applied to produce a 1-km global land cover map (SYNLCover) by integrating five global land cover datasets and three global datasets of tree cover and croplands. Efforts were carried out to assess the quality: 1) inter-comparison of the datasets revealed that the SYNLCover dataset had higher consistency than these input global land cover datasets, suggesting that the data fusion method reduced the disagreement among the input datasets; 2) quality assessment using the human-interpreted reference dataset reported the highest accuracy in the fused SYNLCover dataset, which had an overall accuracy of 71.1%, in contrast to the overall accuracy between 48.6% and 68.9% for the other global land cover datasets.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627global land coverdata integrationaccuracy evaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min Feng
Yan Bai
spellingShingle Min Feng
Yan Bai
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
Big Earth Data
global land cover
data integration
accuracy evaluation
author_facet Min Feng
Yan Bai
author_sort Min Feng
title A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
title_short A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
title_full A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
title_fullStr A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
title_full_unstemmed A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
title_sort global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Big Earth Data
issn 2096-4471
2574-5417
publishDate 2019-07-01
description In the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accuracy of global land cover mapping by fusing the existing datasets. A decision-fuse method was developed based on fuzzy logic to quantify the consistencies and uncertainties of the existing datasets and then aggregated to provide the most certain estimation. The method was applied to produce a 1-km global land cover map (SYNLCover) by integrating five global land cover datasets and three global datasets of tree cover and croplands. Efforts were carried out to assess the quality: 1) inter-comparison of the datasets revealed that the SYNLCover dataset had higher consistency than these input global land cover datasets, suggesting that the data fusion method reduced the disagreement among the input datasets; 2) quality assessment using the human-interpreted reference dataset reported the highest accuracy in the fused SYNLCover dataset, which had an overall accuracy of 71.1%, in contrast to the overall accuracy between 48.6% and 68.9% for the other global land cover datasets.
topic global land cover
data integration
accuracy evaluation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627
work_keys_str_mv AT minfeng agloballandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets
AT yanbai agloballandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets
AT minfeng globallandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets
AT yanbai globallandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets
_version_ 1725013933780107264