A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets
In the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Big Earth Data |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627 |
id |
doaj-3aef98fc2e994af0b4ba08dca4d0428f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3aef98fc2e994af0b4ba08dca4d0428f2020-11-25T01:47:55ZengTaylor & Francis GroupBig Earth Data2096-44712574-54172019-07-013319121910.1080/20964471.2019.16636271663627A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasetsMin Feng0Yan Bai1Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesIn the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accuracy of global land cover mapping by fusing the existing datasets. A decision-fuse method was developed based on fuzzy logic to quantify the consistencies and uncertainties of the existing datasets and then aggregated to provide the most certain estimation. The method was applied to produce a 1-km global land cover map (SYNLCover) by integrating five global land cover datasets and three global datasets of tree cover and croplands. Efforts were carried out to assess the quality: 1) inter-comparison of the datasets revealed that the SYNLCover dataset had higher consistency than these input global land cover datasets, suggesting that the data fusion method reduced the disagreement among the input datasets; 2) quality assessment using the human-interpreted reference dataset reported the highest accuracy in the fused SYNLCover dataset, which had an overall accuracy of 71.1%, in contrast to the overall accuracy between 48.6% and 68.9% for the other global land cover datasets.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627global land coverdata integrationaccuracy evaluation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Min Feng Yan Bai |
spellingShingle |
Min Feng Yan Bai A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets Big Earth Data global land cover data integration accuracy evaluation |
author_facet |
Min Feng Yan Bai |
author_sort |
Min Feng |
title |
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
title_short |
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
title_full |
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
title_fullStr |
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
title_full_unstemmed |
A global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
title_sort |
global land cover map produced through integrating multi-source datasets |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Big Earth Data |
issn |
2096-4471 2574-5417 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
In the past decades, global land cover datasets have been produced but also been criticized for their low accuracies, which have been affecting the applications of these datasets. Producing a new global dataset requires a tremendous amount of efforts; however, it is also possible to improve the accuracy of global land cover mapping by fusing the existing datasets. A decision-fuse method was developed based on fuzzy logic to quantify the consistencies and uncertainties of the existing datasets and then aggregated to provide the most certain estimation. The method was applied to produce a 1-km global land cover map (SYNLCover) by integrating five global land cover datasets and three global datasets of tree cover and croplands. Efforts were carried out to assess the quality: 1) inter-comparison of the datasets revealed that the SYNLCover dataset had higher consistency than these input global land cover datasets, suggesting that the data fusion method reduced the disagreement among the input datasets; 2) quality assessment using the human-interpreted reference dataset reported the highest accuracy in the fused SYNLCover dataset, which had an overall accuracy of 71.1%, in contrast to the overall accuracy between 48.6% and 68.9% for the other global land cover datasets. |
topic |
global land cover data integration accuracy evaluation |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1663627 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minfeng agloballandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets AT yanbai agloballandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets AT minfeng globallandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets AT yanbai globallandcovermapproducedthroughintegratingmultisourcedatasets |
_version_ |
1725013933780107264 |