MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.

MicroRNA arrays possess a number of unique data features that challenge the assumption key to many normalization methods. We assessed the performance of existing normalization methods using two microRNA array datasets derived from the same set of tumor samples: one dataset was generated using a bloc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li-Xuan Qin, Qin Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4048305?pdf=render
id doaj-3aedfbfcd9d9462f92923ebdb547e8ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3aedfbfcd9d9462f92923ebdb547e8ad2020-11-25T00:27:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9887910.1371/journal.pone.0098879MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.Li-Xuan QinQin ZhouMicroRNA arrays possess a number of unique data features that challenge the assumption key to many normalization methods. We assessed the performance of existing normalization methods using two microRNA array datasets derived from the same set of tumor samples: one dataset was generated using a blocked randomization design when assigning arrays to samples and hence was free of confounding array effects; the second dataset was generated without blocking or randomization and exhibited array effects. The randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression between two tumor groups and treated as the benchmark. The non-randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression after normalization and compared against the benchmark. Normalization improved the true positive rate significantly in the non-randomized data but still possessed a false discovery rate as high as 50%. Adding a batch adjustment step before normalization further reduced the number of false positive markers while maintaining a similar number of true positive markers, which resulted in a false discovery rate of 32% to 48%, depending on the specific normalization method. We concluded the paper with some insights on possible causes of false discoveries to shed light on how to improve normalization for microRNA arrays.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4048305?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Li-Xuan Qin
Qin Zhou
spellingShingle Li-Xuan Qin
Qin Zhou
MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Li-Xuan Qin
Qin Zhou
author_sort Li-Xuan Qin
title MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
title_short MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
title_full MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
title_fullStr MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
title_full_unstemmed MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
title_sort microrna array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description MicroRNA arrays possess a number of unique data features that challenge the assumption key to many normalization methods. We assessed the performance of existing normalization methods using two microRNA array datasets derived from the same set of tumor samples: one dataset was generated using a blocked randomization design when assigning arrays to samples and hence was free of confounding array effects; the second dataset was generated without blocking or randomization and exhibited array effects. The randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression between two tumor groups and treated as the benchmark. The non-randomized dataset was assessed for differential expression after normalization and compared against the benchmark. Normalization improved the true positive rate significantly in the non-randomized data but still possessed a false discovery rate as high as 50%. Adding a batch adjustment step before normalization further reduced the number of false positive markers while maintaining a similar number of true positive markers, which resulted in a false discovery rate of 32% to 48%, depending on the specific normalization method. We concluded the paper with some insights on possible causes of false discoveries to shed light on how to improve normalization for microRNA arrays.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4048305?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lixuanqin micrornaarraynormalizationanevaluationusingarandomizeddatasetasthebenchmark
AT qinzhou micrornaarraynormalizationanevaluationusingarandomizeddatasetasthebenchmark
_version_ 1725341528849645568