Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam

Education Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. G. Grant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2001-10-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368
id doaj-3aed006ab23c4457840f010dd29759e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3aed006ab23c4457840f010dd29759e32020-11-25T03:49:13ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412001-10-01939Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography ExamS. G. GrantEducation Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than as well-developed portraits of curriculum and assessment change. In this article, I analyze the new New York State Global History and Geography standards and tests using a set of social studies-specific criteria which inquire deeply into the implications for real instructional change. From that vantage, I argue that New York's policy efforts, while seemingly well-intentioned and reflective of surface-level change, fail to promote powerful teaching and learning in social studies. Teachers intent on producing ambitious teaching and learning will find little to interfere with their efforts. But as a set of reforms intended to encourage substantive change, the new global history test falls short. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. G. Grant
spellingShingle S. G. Grant
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
Education Policy Analysis Archives
author_facet S. G. Grant
author_sort S. G. Grant
title Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
title_short Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
title_full Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
title_fullStr Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
title_sort analyzing the new york global history and geography exam
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2001-10-01
description Education Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than as well-developed portraits of curriculum and assessment change. In this article, I analyze the new New York State Global History and Geography standards and tests using a set of social studies-specific criteria which inquire deeply into the implications for real instructional change. From that vantage, I argue that New York's policy efforts, while seemingly well-intentioned and reflective of surface-level change, fail to promote powerful teaching and learning in social studies. Teachers intent on producing ambitious teaching and learning will find little to interfere with their efforts. But as a set of reforms intended to encourage substantive change, the new global history test falls short.
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368
work_keys_str_mv AT sggrant analyzingthenewyorkglobalhistoryandgeographyexam
_version_ 1724496648488353792