Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam
Education Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2001-10-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Online Access: | http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368 |
id |
doaj-3aed006ab23c4457840f010dd29759e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3aed006ab23c4457840f010dd29759e32020-11-25T03:49:13ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412001-10-01939Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography ExamS. G. GrantEducation Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than as well-developed portraits of curriculum and assessment change. In this article, I analyze the new New York State Global History and Geography standards and tests using a set of social studies-specific criteria which inquire deeply into the implications for real instructional change. From that vantage, I argue that New York's policy efforts, while seemingly well-intentioned and reflective of surface-level change, fail to promote powerful teaching and learning in social studies. Teachers intent on producing ambitious teaching and learning will find little to interfere with their efforts. But as a set of reforms intended to encourage substantive change, the new global history test falls short. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. G. Grant |
spellingShingle |
S. G. Grant Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam Education Policy Analysis Archives |
author_facet |
S. G. Grant |
author_sort |
S. G. Grant |
title |
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam |
title_short |
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam |
title_full |
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam |
title_fullStr |
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analyzing the New York Global History and Geography Exam |
title_sort |
analyzing the new york global history and geography exam |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2001-10-01 |
description |
Education Week's report "Quality Counts" judges New York State's curriculum and assessment policy efforts to be an "A." Surface-level reviews such as "Quality Counts" tell something about the workings of state policy, but they are more useful as snapshots than as well-developed portraits of curriculum and assessment change. In this article, I analyze the new New York State Global History and Geography standards and tests using a set of social studies-specific criteria which inquire deeply into the implications for real instructional change. From that vantage, I argue that New York's policy efforts, while seemingly well-intentioned and reflective of surface-level change, fail to promote powerful teaching and learning in social studies. Teachers intent on producing ambitious teaching and learning will find little to interfere with their efforts. But as a set of reforms intended to encourage substantive change, the new global history test falls short. |
url |
http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/368 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sggrant analyzingthenewyorkglobalhistoryandgeographyexam |
_version_ |
1724496648488353792 |