Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONRepeat prescribing is common in New Zealand general practice. Research also suggests that repeat prescribing is a process prone to error. All New Zealand general practices have to comply with requirements to have a repeat prescribing policy, with the details of the policy to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liza Lack, Steven Lillis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC20098
id doaj-3adfe5f8de0e42a5abc5fe5f3d24e7f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3adfe5f8de0e42a5abc5fe5f3d24e7f42021-05-26T05:06:36ZengCSIRO PublishingJournal of Primary Health Care1172-61562020-01-01124373376HC20098Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it betterLiza Lack0Steven Lillis1General Practice and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland Grafton Campus, Grafton, Auckland, New ZealandGeneral Practice and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland Grafton Campus, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand; and Corresponding author. Email: steven.lillis@outlook.co.nzABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONRepeat prescribing is common in New Zealand general practice. Research also suggests that repeat prescribing is a process prone to error. All New Zealand general practices have to comply with requirements to have a repeat prescribing policy, with the details of the policy to be designed by the practice. AIMTo inform the development of practice policy, research was undertaken with experienced general practitioners to identify and mitigate risk in the process. METHODSAt the 2019 annual conference of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, a workshop was held with 58 experienced general practitioner participants. The group was divided into six small groups, each with the task of discussing one aspect of the repeat prescribing process. The results were then discussed with the whole group and key discussion points were transcribed and analysed. RESULTSIssues identified included: improving patient education on appropriateness of repeat prescribing; having protected time for medicine reconciliation and the task of repeat prescribing; reducing the number of personnel and steps in the process; and clarity over responsibility for repeat prescribing. DISCUSSIONThis research can inform the local development of a repeat prescribing policy at the practice level or be used to critique existing practice policies. Attention was also drawn to the increasing administrative burden that repeat prescribing contributes to in general practice.https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC20098General practiceprescribingpatient safetyhealth policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liza Lack
Steven Lillis
spellingShingle Liza Lack
Steven Lillis
Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
Journal of Primary Health Care
General practice
prescribing
patient safety
health policy
author_facet Liza Lack
Steven Lillis
author_sort Liza Lack
title Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
title_short Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
title_full Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
title_fullStr Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
title_full_unstemmed Repeat prescribing policy in New Zealand general practice: making it better
title_sort repeat prescribing policy in new zealand general practice: making it better
publisher CSIRO Publishing
series Journal of Primary Health Care
issn 1172-6156
publishDate 2020-01-01
description ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONRepeat prescribing is common in New Zealand general practice. Research also suggests that repeat prescribing is a process prone to error. All New Zealand general practices have to comply with requirements to have a repeat prescribing policy, with the details of the policy to be designed by the practice. AIMTo inform the development of practice policy, research was undertaken with experienced general practitioners to identify and mitigate risk in the process. METHODSAt the 2019 annual conference of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners, a workshop was held with 58 experienced general practitioner participants. The group was divided into six small groups, each with the task of discussing one aspect of the repeat prescribing process. The results were then discussed with the whole group and key discussion points were transcribed and analysed. RESULTSIssues identified included: improving patient education on appropriateness of repeat prescribing; having protected time for medicine reconciliation and the task of repeat prescribing; reducing the number of personnel and steps in the process; and clarity over responsibility for repeat prescribing. DISCUSSIONThis research can inform the local development of a repeat prescribing policy at the practice level or be used to critique existing practice policies. Attention was also drawn to the increasing administrative burden that repeat prescribing contributes to in general practice.
topic General practice
prescribing
patient safety
health policy
url https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC20098
work_keys_str_mv AT lizalack repeatprescribingpolicyinnewzealandgeneralpracticemakingitbetter
AT stevenlillis repeatprescribingpolicyinnewzealandgeneralpracticemakingitbetter
_version_ 1721426502421053440