Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions

Chelsea S Bradley,1 Lindsay A Sicks,1 Andrew D Pucker2 1Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA; 2School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USACorrespondence: Andrew D Pucker Email apucker@uab.eduPurpose: Preservatives are essential for preventing contact lens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bradley CS, Sicks LA, Pucker AD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021-09-01
Series:Clinical Optometry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/common-ophthalmic-preservatives-in-soft-contact-lens-care-products-ben-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTO
id doaj-3ad4db256dd748df8ddc9041ba3ea816
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ad4db256dd748df8ddc9041ba3ea8162021-09-07T20:56:37ZengDove Medical PressClinical Optometry1179-27522021-09-01Volume 1327128568562Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved SolutionsBradley CSSicks LAPucker ADChelsea S Bradley,1 Lindsay A Sicks,1 Andrew D Pucker2 1Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA; 2School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USACorrespondence: Andrew D Pucker Email apucker@uab.eduPurpose: Preservatives are essential for preventing contact lens (CL)-related microbial keratitis (MK). The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge related to the use of common ophthalmic preservatives in CL care products with respect to both safety and efficacy.Methods: Manuscripts written in English were obtained by searching PubMed.gov with the term contact lens plus antimicrobial, benzalkonium chloride, biguanide, Aldox, polyquaternium, preservative, thimerosal, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), chlorhexidine, or blister pack.Results: This review found that first-generation preservatives are no longer used in CL multipurpose solutions (MPS) due to their high levels of ocular toxicity. Modern, high-molecular-weight preservatives, including polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1) and biguanides (PHMB), are generally effective against bacteria, minimally effective against fungi, and not effective against Acanthamoeba. PQ-1 and PHMB are likely safe when used with CLs, but they may cause ocular adverse events, with roughly equal risk between the two preservatives. Some CL MPS contain both PQ-1 and PHMB, but no increased risk of adverse events has been reported when combining the two. Hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) solutions are effective against all common ocular microbes, including Acanthamoeba, and they have been proven safe with proper compliance. Povidone-iodine (P-I) solutions are not currently commercially available in North America, but they have been shown in other countries to be safe and effective.Conclusion: Patients should be monitored when using PQ-1 or PHMB-containing solutions since they have been associated with ocular adverse events. If events are detected, patients should be switched to an alternative solution. H2O2 or P-I solutions are preferred for any patient who may expose their CLs to water because they are the only solution categories effective against Acanthamoeba.Keywords: preservatives, contact lenses, care systems, multipurpose solutionshttps://www.dovepress.com/common-ophthalmic-preservatives-in-soft-contact-lens-care-products-ben-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTOpreservativescontact lensescare systemsmultipurpose solutions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bradley CS
Sicks LA
Pucker AD
spellingShingle Bradley CS
Sicks LA
Pucker AD
Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
Clinical Optometry
preservatives
contact lenses
care systems
multipurpose solutions
author_facet Bradley CS
Sicks LA
Pucker AD
author_sort Bradley CS
title Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
title_short Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
title_full Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
title_fullStr Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
title_full_unstemmed Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
title_sort common ophthalmic preservatives in soft contact lens care products: benefits, complications, and a comparison to non-preserved solutions
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Optometry
issn 1179-2752
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Chelsea S Bradley,1 Lindsay A Sicks,1 Andrew D Pucker2 1Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA; 2School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USACorrespondence: Andrew D Pucker Email apucker@uab.eduPurpose: Preservatives are essential for preventing contact lens (CL)-related microbial keratitis (MK). The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge related to the use of common ophthalmic preservatives in CL care products with respect to both safety and efficacy.Methods: Manuscripts written in English were obtained by searching PubMed.gov with the term contact lens plus antimicrobial, benzalkonium chloride, biguanide, Aldox, polyquaternium, preservative, thimerosal, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), chlorhexidine, or blister pack.Results: This review found that first-generation preservatives are no longer used in CL multipurpose solutions (MPS) due to their high levels of ocular toxicity. Modern, high-molecular-weight preservatives, including polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1) and biguanides (PHMB), are generally effective against bacteria, minimally effective against fungi, and not effective against Acanthamoeba. PQ-1 and PHMB are likely safe when used with CLs, but they may cause ocular adverse events, with roughly equal risk between the two preservatives. Some CL MPS contain both PQ-1 and PHMB, but no increased risk of adverse events has been reported when combining the two. Hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) solutions are effective against all common ocular microbes, including Acanthamoeba, and they have been proven safe with proper compliance. Povidone-iodine (P-I) solutions are not currently commercially available in North America, but they have been shown in other countries to be safe and effective.Conclusion: Patients should be monitored when using PQ-1 or PHMB-containing solutions since they have been associated with ocular adverse events. If events are detected, patients should be switched to an alternative solution. H2O2 or P-I solutions are preferred for any patient who may expose their CLs to water because they are the only solution categories effective against Acanthamoeba.Keywords: preservatives, contact lenses, care systems, multipurpose solutions
topic preservatives
contact lenses
care systems
multipurpose solutions
url https://www.dovepress.com/common-ophthalmic-preservatives-in-soft-contact-lens-care-products-ben-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTO
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleycs commonophthalmicpreservativesinsoftcontactlenscareproductsbenefitscomplicationsandacomparisontononpreservedsolutions
AT sicksla commonophthalmicpreservativesinsoftcontactlenscareproductsbenefitscomplicationsandacomparisontononpreservedsolutions
AT puckerad commonophthalmicpreservativesinsoftcontactlenscareproductsbenefitscomplicationsandacomparisontononpreservedsolutions
_version_ 1717763112529035264