Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
People often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decis...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-3ac486fb4cc94a0a9cb0b3bfa372d738 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ac486fb4cc94a0a9cb0b3bfa372d7382020-11-25T01:56:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014653610.1371/journal.pone.0146536Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.Markus SchöbelJörg RieskampRafael HuberPeople often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decisions of others and use this information to make their own decisions. We followed a cognitive modeling approach to elicit the weight people give to social as compared to private individual information. The proposed social influence model shows that participants overweight their own private information relative to social information, contrary to the normative Bayesian account. In our second study, we embedded the abstract decision problem of Study 1 in a medical decision-making problem. We examined whether in a medical situation people also take others' authority into account in addition to the information that their decisions convey. The social influence model illustrates that people weight social information differentially according to the authority of other decision makers. The influence of authority was strongest when an authority's decision contrasted with private information. Both studies illustrate how the social environment provides sources of information that people integrate differently for their decisions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Markus Schöbel Jörg Rieskamp Rafael Huber |
spellingShingle |
Markus Schöbel Jörg Rieskamp Rafael Huber Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Markus Schöbel Jörg Rieskamp Rafael Huber |
author_sort |
Markus Schöbel |
title |
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. |
title_short |
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. |
title_full |
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. |
title_fullStr |
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making. |
title_sort |
social influences in sequential decision making. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
People often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decisions of others and use this information to make their own decisions. We followed a cognitive modeling approach to elicit the weight people give to social as compared to private individual information. The proposed social influence model shows that participants overweight their own private information relative to social information, contrary to the normative Bayesian account. In our second study, we embedded the abstract decision problem of Study 1 in a medical decision-making problem. We examined whether in a medical situation people also take others' authority into account in addition to the information that their decisions convey. The social influence model illustrates that people weight social information differentially according to the authority of other decision makers. The influence of authority was strongest when an authority's decision contrasted with private information. Both studies illustrate how the social environment provides sources of information that people integrate differently for their decisions. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markusschobel socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking AT jorgrieskamp socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking AT rafaelhuber socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking |
_version_ |
1724979949094305792 |