Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.

People often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus Schöbel, Jörg Rieskamp, Rafael Huber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render
id doaj-3ac486fb4cc94a0a9cb0b3bfa372d738
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ac486fb4cc94a0a9cb0b3bfa372d7382020-11-25T01:56:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014653610.1371/journal.pone.0146536Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.Markus SchöbelJörg RieskampRafael HuberPeople often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decisions of others and use this information to make their own decisions. We followed a cognitive modeling approach to elicit the weight people give to social as compared to private individual information. The proposed social influence model shows that participants overweight their own private information relative to social information, contrary to the normative Bayesian account. In our second study, we embedded the abstract decision problem of Study 1 in a medical decision-making problem. We examined whether in a medical situation people also take others' authority into account in addition to the information that their decisions convey. The social influence model illustrates that people weight social information differentially according to the authority of other decision makers. The influence of authority was strongest when an authority's decision contrasted with private information. Both studies illustrate how the social environment provides sources of information that people integrate differently for their decisions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markus Schöbel
Jörg Rieskamp
Rafael Huber
spellingShingle Markus Schöbel
Jörg Rieskamp
Rafael Huber
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Markus Schöbel
Jörg Rieskamp
Rafael Huber
author_sort Markus Schöbel
title Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
title_short Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
title_full Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
title_fullStr Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
title_full_unstemmed Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making.
title_sort social influences in sequential decision making.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description People often make decisions in a social environment. The present work examines social influence on people's decisions in a sequential decision-making situation. In the first experimental study, we implemented an information cascade paradigm, illustrating that people infer information from decisions of others and use this information to make their own decisions. We followed a cognitive modeling approach to elicit the weight people give to social as compared to private individual information. The proposed social influence model shows that participants overweight their own private information relative to social information, contrary to the normative Bayesian account. In our second study, we embedded the abstract decision problem of Study 1 in a medical decision-making problem. We examined whether in a medical situation people also take others' authority into account in addition to the information that their decisions convey. The social influence model illustrates that people weight social information differentially according to the authority of other decision makers. The influence of authority was strongest when an authority's decision contrasted with private information. Both studies illustrate how the social environment provides sources of information that people integrate differently for their decisions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4718651?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT markusschobel socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking
AT jorgrieskamp socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking
AT rafaelhuber socialinfluencesinsequentialdecisionmaking
_version_ 1724979949094305792