Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.

Temporal information is often contained in multi-sensory stimuli, but it is currently unknown how the brain combines e.g. visual and auditory cues into a coherent percept of time. The existing studies of cross-modal time perception mainly support the "modality appropriateness hypothesis",...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joachim Hass, Stefan Blaschke, J Michael Herrmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3373534?pdf=render
id doaj-3ac0ee6cf8b54d5483093ccdec0388c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ac0ee6cf8b54d5483093ccdec0388c22020-11-25T01:57:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3809210.1371/journal.pone.0038092Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.Joachim HassStefan BlaschkeJ Michael HerrmannTemporal information is often contained in multi-sensory stimuli, but it is currently unknown how the brain combines e.g. visual and auditory cues into a coherent percept of time. The existing studies of cross-modal time perception mainly support the "modality appropriateness hypothesis", i.e. the domination of auditory temporal cues over visual ones because of the higher precision of audition for time perception. However, these studies suffer from methodical problems and conflicting results. We introduce a novel experimental paradigm to examine cross-modal time perception by combining an auditory time perception task with a visually guided motor task, requiring participants to follow an elliptic movement on a screen with a robotic manipulandum. We find that subjective duration is distorted according to the speed of visually observed movement: The faster the visual motion, the longer the perceived duration. In contrast, the actual execution of the arm movement does not contribute to this effect, but impairs discrimination performance by dual-task interference. We also show that additional training of the motor task attenuates the interference, but does not affect the distortion of subjective duration. The study demonstrates direct influence of visual motion on auditory temporal representations, which is independent of attentional modulation. At the same time, it provides causal support for the notion that time perception and continuous motor timing rely on separate mechanisms, a proposal that was formerly supported by correlational evidence only. The results constitute a counterexample to the modality appropriateness hypothesis and are best explained by Bayesian integration of modality-specific temporal information into a centralized "temporal hub".http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3373534?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joachim Hass
Stefan Blaschke
J Michael Herrmann
spellingShingle Joachim Hass
Stefan Blaschke
J Michael Herrmann
Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Joachim Hass
Stefan Blaschke
J Michael Herrmann
author_sort Joachim Hass
title Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
title_short Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
title_full Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
title_fullStr Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
title_full_unstemmed Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
title_sort cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Temporal information is often contained in multi-sensory stimuli, but it is currently unknown how the brain combines e.g. visual and auditory cues into a coherent percept of time. The existing studies of cross-modal time perception mainly support the "modality appropriateness hypothesis", i.e. the domination of auditory temporal cues over visual ones because of the higher precision of audition for time perception. However, these studies suffer from methodical problems and conflicting results. We introduce a novel experimental paradigm to examine cross-modal time perception by combining an auditory time perception task with a visually guided motor task, requiring participants to follow an elliptic movement on a screen with a robotic manipulandum. We find that subjective duration is distorted according to the speed of visually observed movement: The faster the visual motion, the longer the perceived duration. In contrast, the actual execution of the arm movement does not contribute to this effect, but impairs discrimination performance by dual-task interference. We also show that additional training of the motor task attenuates the interference, but does not affect the distortion of subjective duration. The study demonstrates direct influence of visual motion on auditory temporal representations, which is independent of attentional modulation. At the same time, it provides causal support for the notion that time perception and continuous motor timing rely on separate mechanisms, a proposal that was formerly supported by correlational evidence only. The results constitute a counterexample to the modality appropriateness hypothesis and are best explained by Bayesian integration of modality-specific temporal information into a centralized "temporal hub".
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3373534?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimhass crossmodaldistortionoftimeperceptiondemergingtheeffectsofobservedandperformedmotion
AT stefanblaschke crossmodaldistortionoftimeperceptiondemergingtheeffectsofobservedandperformedmotion
AT jmichaelherrmann crossmodaldistortionoftimeperceptiondemergingtheeffectsofobservedandperformedmotion
_version_ 1724974009128321024