A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells
Genotoxicity testing is a critical component of chemical assessment. The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the DNA damage response pathways involved in response, is becoming more common. In companion papers previously...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Data in Brief |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340915001699 |
id |
doaj-3ac0ae68f5b14cd4b1a579f3b97fd151 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3ac0ae68f5b14cd4b1a579f3b97fd1512020-11-24T20:42:54ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092015-12-015C778310.1016/j.dib.2015.08.013A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cellsAndrew Williams0Julie K. Buick1Ivy Moffat2Carol D. Swartz3Leslie Recio4Daniel R. Hyduke5Heng-Hong Li6Albert J. Fornace Jr.7Jiri Aubrecht8Carole L. Yauk9Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9Integrated Laboratory Systems Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USAIntegrated Laboratory Systems Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USABiological Engineering Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USADepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20057, USADepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20057, USADrug Safety Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT 06340, USAEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9Genotoxicity testing is a critical component of chemical assessment. The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the DNA damage response pathways involved in response, is becoming more common. In companion papers previously published in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Li et al. (2015) [6] developed a dose optimization protocol that was based on evaluating expression changes in several well-characterized stress-response genes using quantitative real-time PCR in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells in culture. This optimization approach was applied to the analysis of TK6 cells exposed to one of 14 genotoxic or 14 non-genotoxic agents, with sampling 4 h post-exposure. Microarray-based transcriptomic analyses were then used to develop a classifier for genotoxicity using the nearest shrunken centroids method. A panel of 65 genes was identified that could accurately classify toxicants as genotoxic or non-genotoxic. In Buick et al. (2015) [1], the utility of the biomarker for chemicals that require metabolic activation was evaluated. In this study, TK6 cells were exposed to increasing doses of four chemicals (two genotoxic that require metabolic activation and two non-genotoxic chemicals) in the presence of rat liver S9 to demonstrate that S9 does not impair the ability to classify genotoxicity using this genomic biomarker in TK6cells.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340915001699 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrew Williams Julie K. Buick Ivy Moffat Carol D. Swartz Leslie Recio Daniel R. Hyduke Heng-Hong Li Albert J. Fornace Jr. Jiri Aubrecht Carole L. Yauk |
spellingShingle |
Andrew Williams Julie K. Buick Ivy Moffat Carol D. Swartz Leslie Recio Daniel R. Hyduke Heng-Hong Li Albert J. Fornace Jr. Jiri Aubrecht Carole L. Yauk A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells Data in Brief |
author_facet |
Andrew Williams Julie K. Buick Ivy Moffat Carol D. Swartz Leslie Recio Daniel R. Hyduke Heng-Hong Li Albert J. Fornace Jr. Jiri Aubrecht Carole L. Yauk |
author_sort |
Andrew Williams |
title |
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_short |
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_full |
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_fullStr |
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_full_unstemmed |
A predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells |
title_sort |
predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus non-genotoxic chemicals in human tk6 cells |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Data in Brief |
issn |
2352-3409 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Genotoxicity testing is a critical component of chemical assessment. The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the DNA damage response pathways involved in response, is becoming more common. In companion papers previously published in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Li et al. (2015) [6] developed a dose optimization protocol that was based on evaluating expression changes in several well-characterized stress-response genes using quantitative real-time PCR in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells in culture. This optimization approach was applied to the analysis of TK6 cells exposed to one of 14 genotoxic or 14 non-genotoxic agents, with sampling 4 h post-exposure. Microarray-based transcriptomic analyses were then used to develop a classifier for genotoxicity using the nearest shrunken centroids method. A panel of 65 genes was identified that could accurately classify toxicants as genotoxic or non-genotoxic. In Buick et al. (2015) [1], the utility of the biomarker for chemicals that require metabolic activation was evaluated. In this study, TK6 cells were exposed to increasing doses of four chemicals (two genotoxic that require metabolic activation and two non-genotoxic chemicals) in the presence of rat liver S9 to demonstrate that S9 does not impair the ability to classify genotoxicity using this genomic biomarker in TK6cells. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340915001699 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrewwilliams apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT juliekbuick apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT ivymoffat apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT caroldswartz apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT leslierecio apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT danielrhyduke apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT henghongli apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT albertjfornacejr apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT jiriaubrecht apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT carolelyauk apredictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT andrewwilliams predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT juliekbuick predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT ivymoffat predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT caroldswartz predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT leslierecio predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT danielrhyduke predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT henghongli predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT albertjfornacejr predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT jiriaubrecht predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells AT carolelyauk predictivetoxicogenomicssignaturetoclassifygenotoxicversusnongenotoxicchemicalsinhumantk6cells |
_version_ |
1716821312246120448 |