Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation

Category: Lesser Toes Introduction/Purpose: K-wire fixation is the most common operative procedure for hammertoe deformity today. However, intramedullary implants are gaining ground in both number of available choices and in procedures performed. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of hammertoe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seth H. Richman MD, Marcelo B. Siqueira MD, Kirk A. Mccullough MD, Mark J. Berkowitz MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-08-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00157
id doaj-3ab672c078694ea0b49326047f9c0f0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ab672c078694ea0b49326047f9c0f0b2020-11-25T03:00:05ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142016-08-01110.1177/2473011416S00157Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixationSeth H. Richman MDMarcelo B. Siqueira MDKirk A. Mccullough MDMark J. Berkowitz MDCategory: Lesser Toes Introduction/Purpose: K-wire fixation is the most common operative procedure for hammertoe deformity today. However, intramedullary implants are gaining ground in both number of available choices and in procedures performed. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of hammertoe correction performed with K-wire fixation versus a novel intramedullary fusion device. Methods: A retrospective review of hammertoe correction by a single surgeon was performed from June 2011 to December 2013. Sixty patients (95 toes) underwent K-wire fixation and 39 patients (54 toes) underwent fusion with the intramedullary implant. Average age was 61.7 years and 61.4 years, respectively. Average length of follow up was 12.9 and 12.3 months, respectively. Patients were evaluated for medical comorbidities, smoking status, inflammatory arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, pre and postoperative visual analogue pain scale, bony union percentage, revision rate, complications (hardware and surgery-related), and persistent symptoms at last follow up. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the two groups (p>0.05). In the K-wire group, sixteen patients (18 toes) remained symptomatic (27%). Nine toes (9.5%) had recurrent deformity, three toes (3%) developed a late infection due to the recurrent deformity and one toe (1%) developed partial numbness. One patient suffered a calf DVT and peroneal nerve neuritis, one patient developed a foot drop, and three patients continued to complain of pain. Five toes required revision surgery (5.3%). In the intramedullary group three (7.7%) patients remained symptomatic. One patient developed CRPS in the foot, calf DVT, and a non-fatal PE. A second patient developed a painless recurrent deformity. A third patient had wound dehiscence. Nobody suffered hardware failure or required a second operation. Conclusion: The intramedullary device for hammertoe correction resulted in less complications, recurrent deformity, and reoperations than K-wire fixation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00157
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seth H. Richman MD
Marcelo B. Siqueira MD
Kirk A. Mccullough MD
Mark J. Berkowitz MD
spellingShingle Seth H. Richman MD
Marcelo B. Siqueira MD
Kirk A. Mccullough MD
Mark J. Berkowitz MD
Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
author_facet Seth H. Richman MD
Marcelo B. Siqueira MD
Kirk A. Mccullough MD
Mark J. Berkowitz MD
author_sort Seth H. Richman MD
title Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
title_short Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
title_full Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
title_fullStr Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
title_full_unstemmed Correction of Hammer Toe Deformity with Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device versus K-Wire fixation
title_sort correction of hammer toe deformity with novel intramedullary pip fusion device versus k-wire fixation
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
issn 2473-0114
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Category: Lesser Toes Introduction/Purpose: K-wire fixation is the most common operative procedure for hammertoe deformity today. However, intramedullary implants are gaining ground in both number of available choices and in procedures performed. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of hammertoe correction performed with K-wire fixation versus a novel intramedullary fusion device. Methods: A retrospective review of hammertoe correction by a single surgeon was performed from June 2011 to December 2013. Sixty patients (95 toes) underwent K-wire fixation and 39 patients (54 toes) underwent fusion with the intramedullary implant. Average age was 61.7 years and 61.4 years, respectively. Average length of follow up was 12.9 and 12.3 months, respectively. Patients were evaluated for medical comorbidities, smoking status, inflammatory arthritis, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, pre and postoperative visual analogue pain scale, bony union percentage, revision rate, complications (hardware and surgery-related), and persistent symptoms at last follow up. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the two groups (p>0.05). In the K-wire group, sixteen patients (18 toes) remained symptomatic (27%). Nine toes (9.5%) had recurrent deformity, three toes (3%) developed a late infection due to the recurrent deformity and one toe (1%) developed partial numbness. One patient suffered a calf DVT and peroneal nerve neuritis, one patient developed a foot drop, and three patients continued to complain of pain. Five toes required revision surgery (5.3%). In the intramedullary group three (7.7%) patients remained symptomatic. One patient developed CRPS in the foot, calf DVT, and a non-fatal PE. A second patient developed a painless recurrent deformity. A third patient had wound dehiscence. Nobody suffered hardware failure or required a second operation. Conclusion: The intramedullary device for hammertoe correction resulted in less complications, recurrent deformity, and reoperations than K-wire fixation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011416S00157
work_keys_str_mv AT sethhrichmanmd correctionofhammertoedeformitywithnovelintramedullarypipfusiondeviceversuskwirefixation
AT marcelobsiqueiramd correctionofhammertoedeformitywithnovelintramedullarypipfusiondeviceversuskwirefixation
AT kirkamcculloughmd correctionofhammertoedeformitywithnovelintramedullarypipfusiondeviceversuskwirefixation
AT markjberkowitzmd correctionofhammertoedeformitywithnovelintramedullarypipfusiondeviceversuskwirefixation
_version_ 1724699520664600576