Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies

Purpose: Medical societies are incorporating Twitter to communicate with their members and connect with patients. This study compares the online presence of 3 major oncologic societies. Methods and materials: All available tweets in 2014 by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), Americ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sachin R. Jhawar, MD, Vinay Prabhu, MD, Matthew S. Katz, MD, Sabin B. Motwani, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-07-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109417301033
id doaj-3aa2872645004fd5ba1e0fe429dc53b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3aa2872645004fd5ba1e0fe429dc53b02020-11-25T01:13:30ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942017-07-012327027610.1016/j.adro.2017.06.003Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societiesSachin R. Jhawar, MD0Vinay Prabhu, MD1Matthew S. Katz, MD2Sabin B. Motwani, MD3Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New JerseyDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New YorkDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MassachusettsRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New JerseyPurpose: Medical societies are incorporating Twitter to communicate with their members and connect with patients. This study compares the online presence of 3 major oncologic societies. Methods and materials: All available tweets in 2014 by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) were collected. We analyzed whether posts were original content or retweets. The monthly tweet rate was followed to assess trends. We created 2 new metrics, supporter ratio and tweet density, to correlate online presence and engagement with offline membership breadth. The supporter ratio is the number of people following the organization divided by the number of registered members of each society. The tweet density is the total number of posts divided by the number of registered members of each society. Results: In February 2015, ASCO, ASTRO, and SSO had 36,385; 10,899; and 2721 members, respectively. ASCO's Twitter handle had 33,974 followers, with a supporter ratio of 0.93. A total of 2563 original tweets and 1416 retweets were estimated, which represents a tweet density of 0.11. @ASTRO_org had 5445 followers and a supporter ratio of 0.50. In 2014, ASTRO posted 415 original content tweets and 9 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.039. SSO had a supporter ratio of 0.91 on the basis of 2481 followers. In 2014, SSO posted 207 original tweets and 190 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.15. An increase in tweets and retweets was seen during the month of each society's annual meeting. ASTRO's 61% increase in September 2014 was smaller than SSO's 462% and ASCO's 84%. Conclusion: ASTRO's use of Twitter lags behind ASCO and SSO. Although all 3 societies show increased Twitter use during their annual meetings, they should work toward more meaningful engagement throughout the year. The new metrics of tweet density and supporter ratio will serve as benchmarks for member engagement in future studies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109417301033
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sachin R. Jhawar, MD
Vinay Prabhu, MD
Matthew S. Katz, MD
Sabin B. Motwani, MD
spellingShingle Sachin R. Jhawar, MD
Vinay Prabhu, MD
Matthew S. Katz, MD
Sabin B. Motwani, MD
Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
Advances in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Sachin R. Jhawar, MD
Vinay Prabhu, MD
Matthew S. Katz, MD
Sabin B. Motwani, MD
author_sort Sachin R. Jhawar, MD
title Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
title_short Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
title_full Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
title_fullStr Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
title_full_unstemmed Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies
title_sort tweet for the cure: a snapshot of twitter usage by 3 u.s. oncologic professional societies
publisher Elsevier
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
issn 2452-1094
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Purpose: Medical societies are incorporating Twitter to communicate with their members and connect with patients. This study compares the online presence of 3 major oncologic societies. Methods and materials: All available tweets in 2014 by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) were collected. We analyzed whether posts were original content or retweets. The monthly tweet rate was followed to assess trends. We created 2 new metrics, supporter ratio and tweet density, to correlate online presence and engagement with offline membership breadth. The supporter ratio is the number of people following the organization divided by the number of registered members of each society. The tweet density is the total number of posts divided by the number of registered members of each society. Results: In February 2015, ASCO, ASTRO, and SSO had 36,385; 10,899; and 2721 members, respectively. ASCO's Twitter handle had 33,974 followers, with a supporter ratio of 0.93. A total of 2563 original tweets and 1416 retweets were estimated, which represents a tweet density of 0.11. @ASTRO_org had 5445 followers and a supporter ratio of 0.50. In 2014, ASTRO posted 415 original content tweets and 9 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.039. SSO had a supporter ratio of 0.91 on the basis of 2481 followers. In 2014, SSO posted 207 original tweets and 190 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.15. An increase in tweets and retweets was seen during the month of each society's annual meeting. ASTRO's 61% increase in September 2014 was smaller than SSO's 462% and ASCO's 84%. Conclusion: ASTRO's use of Twitter lags behind ASCO and SSO. Although all 3 societies show increased Twitter use during their annual meetings, they should work toward more meaningful engagement throughout the year. The new metrics of tweet density and supporter ratio will serve as benchmarks for member engagement in future studies.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109417301033
work_keys_str_mv AT sachinrjhawarmd tweetforthecureasnapshotoftwitterusageby3usoncologicprofessionalsocieties
AT vinayprabhumd tweetforthecureasnapshotoftwitterusageby3usoncologicprofessionalsocieties
AT matthewskatzmd tweetforthecureasnapshotoftwitterusageby3usoncologicprofessionalsocieties
AT sabinbmotwanimd tweetforthecureasnapshotoftwitterusageby3usoncologicprofessionalsocieties
_version_ 1725161866762649600