Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation

Regulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geogr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Groningen Press 2018-03-01
Series:Groningen Journal of International Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129
id doaj-3a9d2addbf3a452daf0d13a59060c588
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a9d2addbf3a452daf0d13a59060c5882021-08-24T12:12:10ZengUniversity of Groningen PressGroningen Journal of International Law2352-26742018-03-0121548010.21827/5a86a7e10e00121083Using Private Contracts for Climate Change MitigationKateřina Peterková MitkidisRegulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geographical reach creates incentives for companies to outsource environmentally heavy activities to countries with weaker regimes, the socalled “carbon leakage” effect. As a result the carbon emissions among international supply chains amount to multiple yearly emissions of some developed countries. This gap needs to be closed if we aim for effective global solutions to climate change. The majority of scholars agree that no single regulatory tool alone can remedy the situation, but that a combination of public and private, mandatory and voluntary regimes is necessary. The author proposes that supply chain contracts are the missing piece in the international climate change regulatory matrix. The article discusses why, despite their potential, supply chain contracts have hitherto experienced only little attention and why they can be successful where other regulation fails. It concludes that the potential of private contracting should be triggered by adequate regulation.https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129climate change regulationinternational supply chain contractscarbon emissionsprivate regulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis
spellingShingle Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
Groningen Journal of International Law
climate change regulation
international supply chain contracts
carbon emissions
private regulation
author_facet Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis
author_sort Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis
title Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
title_short Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
title_full Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
title_fullStr Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
title_sort using private contracts for climate change mitigation
publisher University of Groningen Press
series Groningen Journal of International Law
issn 2352-2674
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Regulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geographical reach creates incentives for companies to outsource environmentally heavy activities to countries with weaker regimes, the socalled “carbon leakage” effect. As a result the carbon emissions among international supply chains amount to multiple yearly emissions of some developed countries. This gap needs to be closed if we aim for effective global solutions to climate change. The majority of scholars agree that no single regulatory tool alone can remedy the situation, but that a combination of public and private, mandatory and voluntary regimes is necessary. The author proposes that supply chain contracts are the missing piece in the international climate change regulatory matrix. The article discusses why, despite their potential, supply chain contracts have hitherto experienced only little attention and why they can be successful where other regulation fails. It concludes that the potential of private contracting should be triggered by adequate regulation.
topic climate change regulation
international supply chain contracts
carbon emissions
private regulation
url https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129
work_keys_str_mv AT katerinapeterkovamitkidis usingprivatecontractsforclimatechangemitigation
_version_ 1721197566548246528