Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation
Regulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geogr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Groningen Press
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Groningen Journal of International Law |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129 |
id |
doaj-3a9d2addbf3a452daf0d13a59060c588 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3a9d2addbf3a452daf0d13a59060c5882021-08-24T12:12:10ZengUniversity of Groningen PressGroningen Journal of International Law2352-26742018-03-0121548010.21827/5a86a7e10e00121083Using Private Contracts for Climate Change MitigationKateřina Peterková MitkidisRegulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geographical reach creates incentives for companies to outsource environmentally heavy activities to countries with weaker regimes, the socalled “carbon leakage” effect. As a result the carbon emissions among international supply chains amount to multiple yearly emissions of some developed countries. This gap needs to be closed if we aim for effective global solutions to climate change. The majority of scholars agree that no single regulatory tool alone can remedy the situation, but that a combination of public and private, mandatory and voluntary regimes is necessary. The author proposes that supply chain contracts are the missing piece in the international climate change regulatory matrix. The article discusses why, despite their potential, supply chain contracts have hitherto experienced only little attention and why they can be successful where other regulation fails. It concludes that the potential of private contracting should be triggered by adequate regulation.https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129climate change regulationinternational supply chain contractscarbon emissionsprivate regulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis |
spellingShingle |
Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation Groningen Journal of International Law climate change regulation international supply chain contracts carbon emissions private regulation |
author_facet |
Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis |
author_sort |
Kateřina Peterková Mitkidis |
title |
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation |
title_short |
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation |
title_full |
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation |
title_fullStr |
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Private Contracts for Climate Change Mitigation |
title_sort |
using private contracts for climate change mitigation |
publisher |
University of Groningen Press |
series |
Groningen Journal of International Law |
issn |
2352-2674 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Regulation of climate change is caught up in a stalemate. Differences between developed and developing countries prevent reaching an international agreement. Transnational private regulation has unclear legitimacy, effectiveness and enforcement. National efforts are valuable, but their limited geographical reach creates incentives for companies to outsource environmentally heavy activities to countries with weaker regimes, the socalled “carbon leakage” effect. As a result the carbon emissions among international supply chains amount to multiple yearly emissions of some developed countries. This gap needs to be closed if we aim for effective global solutions to climate change. The majority of scholars agree that no single regulatory tool alone can remedy the situation, but that a combination of public and private, mandatory and voluntary regimes is necessary. The author proposes that supply chain contracts are the missing piece in the international climate change regulatory matrix. The article discusses why, despite their potential, supply chain contracts have hitherto experienced only little attention and why they can be successful where other regulation fails. It concludes that the potential of private contracting should be triggered by adequate regulation. |
topic |
climate change regulation international supply chain contracts carbon emissions private regulation |
url |
https://ugp.rug.nl/GROJIL/article/view/31129 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katerinapeterkovamitkidis usingprivatecontractsforclimatechangemitigation |
_version_ |
1721197566548246528 |