Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review

Rebar, the core resource of reinforced concrete structures, generates more carbon dioxide per unit weight than any other construction resource. Therefore, reducing rebar cutting wastes greatly contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG). Over the past decades, many studies have been conduct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keehoon Kwon, Doyeong Kim, Sunkuk Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5929
id doaj-3a9be348f9444285b68ff2d3b50e453f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a9be348f9444285b68ff2d3b50e453f2021-06-01T00:59:33ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-05-01135929592910.3390/su13115929Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature ReviewKeehoon Kwon0Doyeong Kim1Sunkuk Kim2Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, KoreaDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, KoreaDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, KoreaRebar, the core resource of reinforced concrete structures, generates more carbon dioxide per unit weight than any other construction resource. Therefore, reducing rebar cutting wastes greatly contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG). Over the past decades, many studies have been conducted to minimize cutting wastes, and various optimization algorithms have been proposed. However, the reality is that about 3 to 5% of cutting wastes are still generated. In this paper, the trends in the research on cutting waste minimization (CWM) of rebar for sustainable work are reviewed in a systematic method with meta-analysis. So far, the literature related to cutting waste minimization or optimization of rebar published has been identified, screened, and selected for eligibility by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the final 52 records have been included in quantitative and qualitative syntheses. Review by meta-analysis was conducted on selected literatures, and the results were discussed. The findings identified after reviewing the literature are: (1) many studies have performed optimization for the market length, making it difficult to realize near-zero cutting wastes; (2) to achieve near-zero cutting wastes, rebars must be matched to a specific length by partially adjusting the lap splice position (LSP); (3) CWM is not a one-dimensional problem but an n-dimensional cutting stock problem when considering several rebar combination conditions; and (4) CWM should be dealt with in terms of sustainable value chain management in terms of GHG contributions.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5929rebar cutting wasteminimizationoptimizationstructural worksystematic literature review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keehoon Kwon
Doyeong Kim
Sunkuk Kim
spellingShingle Keehoon Kwon
Doyeong Kim
Sunkuk Kim
Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
Sustainability
rebar cutting waste
minimization
optimization
structural work
systematic literature review
author_facet Keehoon Kwon
Doyeong Kim
Sunkuk Kim
author_sort Keehoon Kwon
title Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Cutting Waste Minimization of Rebar for Sustainable Structural Work: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort cutting waste minimization of rebar for sustainable structural work: a systematic literature review
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Rebar, the core resource of reinforced concrete structures, generates more carbon dioxide per unit weight than any other construction resource. Therefore, reducing rebar cutting wastes greatly contributes to the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG). Over the past decades, many studies have been conducted to minimize cutting wastes, and various optimization algorithms have been proposed. However, the reality is that about 3 to 5% of cutting wastes are still generated. In this paper, the trends in the research on cutting waste minimization (CWM) of rebar for sustainable work are reviewed in a systematic method with meta-analysis. So far, the literature related to cutting waste minimization or optimization of rebar published has been identified, screened, and selected for eligibility by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and the final 52 records have been included in quantitative and qualitative syntheses. Review by meta-analysis was conducted on selected literatures, and the results were discussed. The findings identified after reviewing the literature are: (1) many studies have performed optimization for the market length, making it difficult to realize near-zero cutting wastes; (2) to achieve near-zero cutting wastes, rebars must be matched to a specific length by partially adjusting the lap splice position (LSP); (3) CWM is not a one-dimensional problem but an n-dimensional cutting stock problem when considering several rebar combination conditions; and (4) CWM should be dealt with in terms of sustainable value chain management in terms of GHG contributions.
topic rebar cutting waste
minimization
optimization
structural work
systematic literature review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5929
work_keys_str_mv AT keehoonkwon cuttingwasteminimizationofrebarforsustainablestructuralworkasystematicliteraturereview
AT doyeongkim cuttingwasteminimizationofrebarforsustainablestructuralworkasystematicliteraturereview
AT sunkukkim cuttingwasteminimizationofrebarforsustainablestructuralworkasystematicliteraturereview
_version_ 1721413280239452160