Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis

Abstract Accurate and site‐specific information on tillage practice is vital to understand the impacts of crop management on water quality, soil conservation, and soil carbon sequestration. Remote sensing is a cost‐effective technique for surveillance and rapid assessment of tillage practice over la...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonisa Sharma, Kundan Dhakal, Pradeep Wagle, Ayse Kilic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20000
id doaj-3a91a3444abb4957b89dd769a047a9ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a91a3444abb4957b89dd769a047a9ce2021-02-19T11:21:42ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962020-01-0131n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20000Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysisSonisa Sharma0Kundan Dhakal1Pradeep Wagle2Ayse Kilic3Noble Research Institute LLC, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway Ardmore OK 73401Noble Research Institute LLC, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway Ardmore OK 73401USDA, Agricultural Research Service Grazinglands Research Laboratory El Reno OK 73036School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln NE 68583Abstract Accurate and site‐specific information on tillage practice is vital to understand the impacts of crop management on water quality, soil conservation, and soil carbon sequestration. Remote sensing is a cost‐effective technique for surveillance and rapid assessment of tillage practice over large areas. A new empirical approach for accurately predicting tillage class using discriminant analysis (DA) on historical multi‐temporal Landsat‐TM 5 imagery has been developed. Ground truth data were obtained from the USDA‐NRCS at 48 locations (20 conventional till [CT] and 28 conservation tillage or no‐till [NT]). Classification accuracies were obtained for the DA models using reflectance values of Landsat‐5 TM bands and Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI) values. The performance of the DA models was compared with Logistic Regression (LR) models. On the basis of classification accuracy and kappa (κ) value, our results showed that the DA models performed better in tillage classification than the LR models. However, using NDTI values, both the DA and LR models performed similarly in tillage class discrimination. Model performance improved when a subset of locations rather than years was used. The results indicated broad‐scale mapping of tillage practices is feasible using historical Landsat‐5 TM imagery and DA‐based classification.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20000
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonisa Sharma
Kundan Dhakal
Pradeep Wagle
Ayse Kilic
spellingShingle Sonisa Sharma
Kundan Dhakal
Pradeep Wagle
Ayse Kilic
Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
author_facet Sonisa Sharma
Kundan Dhakal
Pradeep Wagle
Ayse Kilic
author_sort Sonisa Sharma
title Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
title_short Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
title_full Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
title_fullStr Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective tillage differentiation using the Landsat‐5 TM archive with discriminant analysis
title_sort retrospective tillage differentiation using the landsat‐5 tm archive with discriminant analysis
publisher Wiley
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
issn 2639-6696
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Accurate and site‐specific information on tillage practice is vital to understand the impacts of crop management on water quality, soil conservation, and soil carbon sequestration. Remote sensing is a cost‐effective technique for surveillance and rapid assessment of tillage practice over large areas. A new empirical approach for accurately predicting tillage class using discriminant analysis (DA) on historical multi‐temporal Landsat‐TM 5 imagery has been developed. Ground truth data were obtained from the USDA‐NRCS at 48 locations (20 conventional till [CT] and 28 conservation tillage or no‐till [NT]). Classification accuracies were obtained for the DA models using reflectance values of Landsat‐5 TM bands and Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI) values. The performance of the DA models was compared with Logistic Regression (LR) models. On the basis of classification accuracy and kappa (κ) value, our results showed that the DA models performed better in tillage classification than the LR models. However, using NDTI values, both the DA and LR models performed similarly in tillage class discrimination. Model performance improved when a subset of locations rather than years was used. The results indicated broad‐scale mapping of tillage practices is feasible using historical Landsat‐5 TM imagery and DA‐based classification.
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20000
work_keys_str_mv AT sonisasharma retrospectivetillagedifferentiationusingthelandsat5tmarchivewithdiscriminantanalysis
AT kundandhakal retrospectivetillagedifferentiationusingthelandsat5tmarchivewithdiscriminantanalysis
AT pradeepwagle retrospectivetillagedifferentiationusingthelandsat5tmarchivewithdiscriminantanalysis
AT aysekilic retrospectivetillagedifferentiationusingthelandsat5tmarchivewithdiscriminantanalysis
_version_ 1724261246598905856