Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.

The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli Nati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joana Roque de Pinho, Clara Grilo, Randall B Boone, Kathleen A Galvin, Jeffrey G Snodgrass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render
id doaj-3a782478b20f4095aadcf9755f9e089b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a782478b20f4095aadcf9755f9e089b2020-11-25T01:17:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8884210.1371/journal.pone.0088842Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.Joana Roque de PinhoClara GriloRandall B BooneKathleen A GalvinJeffrey G SnodgrassThe influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection ("rescuing them"), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joana Roque de Pinho
Clara Grilo
Randall B Boone
Kathleen A Galvin
Jeffrey G Snodgrass
spellingShingle Joana Roque de Pinho
Clara Grilo
Randall B Boone
Kathleen A Galvin
Jeffrey G Snodgrass
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Joana Roque de Pinho
Clara Grilo
Randall B Boone
Kathleen A Galvin
Jeffrey G Snodgrass
author_sort Joana Roque de Pinho
title Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
title_short Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
title_full Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
title_fullStr Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
title_full_unstemmed Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
title_sort influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in kenyan agropastoralist communities.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection ("rescuing them"), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT joanaroquedepinho influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities
AT claragrilo influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities
AT randallbboone influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities
AT kathleenagalvin influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities
AT jeffreygsnodgrass influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities
_version_ 1725145852476915712