Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.
The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli Nati...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-3a782478b20f4095aadcf9755f9e089b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3a782478b20f4095aadcf9755f9e089b2020-11-25T01:17:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8884210.1371/journal.pone.0088842Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.Joana Roque de PinhoClara GriloRandall B BooneKathleen A GalvinJeffrey G SnodgrassThe influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection ("rescuing them"), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joana Roque de Pinho Clara Grilo Randall B Boone Kathleen A Galvin Jeffrey G Snodgrass |
spellingShingle |
Joana Roque de Pinho Clara Grilo Randall B Boone Kathleen A Galvin Jeffrey G Snodgrass Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Joana Roque de Pinho Clara Grilo Randall B Boone Kathleen A Galvin Jeffrey G Snodgrass |
author_sort |
Joana Roque de Pinho |
title |
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
title_short |
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
title_full |
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
title_fullStr |
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
title_sort |
influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in kenyan agropastoralist communities. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection ("rescuing them"), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3925186?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joanaroquedepinho influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities AT claragrilo influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities AT randallbboone influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities AT kathleenagalvin influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities AT jeffreygsnodgrass influenceofaestheticappreciationofwildlifespeciesonattitudestowardstheirconservationinkenyanagropastoralistcommunities |
_version_ |
1725145852476915712 |