Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.

Percussive technology continues to play an increasingly important role in understanding the evolution of tool use. Comparing the archaeological record with extractive foraging behaviors in nonhuman primates has focused on percussive implements as a key to investigating the origins of lithic technolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew V Caruana, Susana Carvalho, David R Braun, Darya Presnyakova, Michael Haslam, Will Archer, Rene Bobe, John W K Harris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4240665?pdf=render
id doaj-3a6c595692394deb852f85976cab8a48
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a6c595692394deb852f85976cab8a482020-11-24T21:50:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11385610.1371/journal.pone.0113856Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.Matthew V CaruanaSusana CarvalhoDavid R BraunDarya PresnyakovaMichael HaslamWill ArcherRene BobeJohn W K HarrisPercussive technology continues to play an increasingly important role in understanding the evolution of tool use. Comparing the archaeological record with extractive foraging behaviors in nonhuman primates has focused on percussive implements as a key to investigating the origins of lithic technology. Despite this, archaeological approaches towards percussive tools have been obscured by a lack of standardized methodologies. Central to this issue have been the use of qualitative, non-diagnostic techniques to identify percussive tools from archaeological contexts. Here we describe a new morphometric method for distinguishing anthropogenically-generated damage patterns on percussive tools from naturally damaged river cobbles. We employ a geomatic approach through the use of three-dimensional scanning and geographical information systems software to statistically quantify the identification process in percussive technology research. This will strengthen current technological analyses of percussive tools in archaeological frameworks and open new avenues for translating behavioral inferences of early hominins from percussive damage patterns.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4240665?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew V Caruana
Susana Carvalho
David R Braun
Darya Presnyakova
Michael Haslam
Will Archer
Rene Bobe
John W K Harris
spellingShingle Matthew V Caruana
Susana Carvalho
David R Braun
Darya Presnyakova
Michael Haslam
Will Archer
Rene Bobe
John W K Harris
Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Matthew V Caruana
Susana Carvalho
David R Braun
Darya Presnyakova
Michael Haslam
Will Archer
Rene Bobe
John W K Harris
author_sort Matthew V Caruana
title Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
title_short Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
title_full Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
title_fullStr Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
title_sort quantifying traces of tool use: a novel morphometric analysis of damage patterns on percussive tools.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Percussive technology continues to play an increasingly important role in understanding the evolution of tool use. Comparing the archaeological record with extractive foraging behaviors in nonhuman primates has focused on percussive implements as a key to investigating the origins of lithic technology. Despite this, archaeological approaches towards percussive tools have been obscured by a lack of standardized methodologies. Central to this issue have been the use of qualitative, non-diagnostic techniques to identify percussive tools from archaeological contexts. Here we describe a new morphometric method for distinguishing anthropogenically-generated damage patterns on percussive tools from naturally damaged river cobbles. We employ a geomatic approach through the use of three-dimensional scanning and geographical information systems software to statistically quantify the identification process in percussive technology research. This will strengthen current technological analyses of percussive tools in archaeological frameworks and open new avenues for translating behavioral inferences of early hominins from percussive damage patterns.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4240665?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewvcaruana quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT susanacarvalho quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT davidrbraun quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT daryapresnyakova quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT michaelhaslam quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT willarcher quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT renebobe quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
AT johnwkharris quantifyingtracesoftooluseanovelmorphometricanalysisofdamagepatternsonpercussivetools
_version_ 1725883329067089920