Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism

Many serious problems occur due to conflicts between the interests of the present generation and the welfare of future generations, and thus, the actions of the preset generation may be a consequence of presentism. Drawing on the theoretical framework of metacognition, the present study investigates...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoshinori Nakagawa, Tatsuyoshi Saijo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7552
id doaj-3a56fc57e6af40fd937ed5c035014a32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a56fc57e6af40fd937ed5c035014a322020-11-25T03:47:23ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-09-01127552755210.3390/su12187552Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for PresentismYoshinori Nakagawa0Tatsuyoshi Saijo1School of Economics and Management, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi 782-8502, JapanResearch Institute for Future Design, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi 780-8515, JapanMany serious problems occur due to conflicts between the interests of the present generation and the welfare of future generations, and thus, the actions of the preset generation may be a consequence of presentism. Drawing on the theoretical framework of metacognition, the present study investigates how presentism can be overcome through future design interventions that incorporate an imaginary future generation setting. Four workshop participants were interviewed, and transcripts of the interviews were made. There were two major findings. First, we identified narratives in the responses of participants that suggest that metacognition was active during the workshops concerning the two cognitions governed by present and future selves. Second, the narratives identified above were classified into two categories, and the two corresponding roles of metacognition were identified: the monitoring and controlling function and the harmonizing function. The former is essential for the acquisition of identity as a future person; the latter is essential for reconciling this future identity with the identity of the person in the present. The present study proposes that future design is a tool that can be used to intervene in the metacognition of individuals concerning how one chooses a temporal reference point from which to view the past, present, and future of society rather than a tool to naively motivate individuals to care for future generations.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7552sustainabilityfuture designimaginary future generationmetacognitionqualitative researchsense of coherence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoshinori Nakagawa
Tatsuyoshi Saijo
spellingShingle Yoshinori Nakagawa
Tatsuyoshi Saijo
Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
Sustainability
sustainability
future design
imaginary future generation
metacognition
qualitative research
sense of coherence
author_facet Yoshinori Nakagawa
Tatsuyoshi Saijo
author_sort Yoshinori Nakagawa
title Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
title_short Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
title_full Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
title_fullStr Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
title_full_unstemmed Future Design as a Metacognitive Intervention for Presentism
title_sort future design as a metacognitive intervention for presentism
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Many serious problems occur due to conflicts between the interests of the present generation and the welfare of future generations, and thus, the actions of the preset generation may be a consequence of presentism. Drawing on the theoretical framework of metacognition, the present study investigates how presentism can be overcome through future design interventions that incorporate an imaginary future generation setting. Four workshop participants were interviewed, and transcripts of the interviews were made. There were two major findings. First, we identified narratives in the responses of participants that suggest that metacognition was active during the workshops concerning the two cognitions governed by present and future selves. Second, the narratives identified above were classified into two categories, and the two corresponding roles of metacognition were identified: the monitoring and controlling function and the harmonizing function. The former is essential for the acquisition of identity as a future person; the latter is essential for reconciling this future identity with the identity of the person in the present. The present study proposes that future design is a tool that can be used to intervene in the metacognition of individuals concerning how one chooses a temporal reference point from which to view the past, present, and future of society rather than a tool to naively motivate individuals to care for future generations.
topic sustainability
future design
imaginary future generation
metacognition
qualitative research
sense of coherence
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7552
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshinorinakagawa futuredesignasametacognitiveinterventionforpresentism
AT tatsuyoshisaijo futuredesignasametacognitiveinterventionforpresentism
_version_ 1724502161687052288