An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda

In this paper, I suggest an alternative form of periodization of Romanian history. My aim is not to move around historical posts; rather I propose a different way of understanding Romanian history as such. This is the research agenda. I seek to write a world history from the perspective of a periphe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Poenaru Florin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-06-01
Series:Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2016-0006
id doaj-3a1fb4cffe1c4cc9a9610781740e49fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a1fb4cffe1c4cc9a9610781740e49fc2021-09-05T14:00:48ZengSciendoStudia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia2066-04642016-06-0161112914610.1515/subbs-2016-0006subbs-2016-0006An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research AgendaPoenaru Florin0 Postdoctoral Fellow at the Central European University BudapestIn this paper, I suggest an alternative form of periodization of Romanian history. My aim is not to move around historical posts; rather I propose a different way of understanding Romanian history as such. This is the research agenda. I seek to write a world history from the perspective of a peripheral place like Romania has been. Therefore, this is not simply an attempt to insert a local, neglected, silenced or distorted history into a wider, European, global story (that is, to discover the history of “people without history”), just as it is not another attempt to “provincialize Europe” in favour of a view from its repressed margins. Instead, following Coronil (2004), I believe it is indispensable to globalize the periphery, to understand its worldwide formation. My investigation draws upon the conceptual toolkit of world-system theory and its underlining philosophy of history (Wallerstein, 2011). In the same vein, the guiding principles of my periodization elaborate on Andre Gunder Frank’s insight that the exchange (or rather direct transfer) of surplus between societies is what links regions and societies as whole (Frank, 1978). The focus then shifts from a given society/state and its internal relations to the wider world-system, or world-economy, in which it is embedded. The unit of analysis is not a geographical location, but relations and networks and their historical development.https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2016-0006historical periodizationworld-system theoriesworld-economyromanian history
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Poenaru Florin
spellingShingle Poenaru Florin
An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
historical periodization
world-system theories
world-economy
romanian history
author_facet Poenaru Florin
author_sort Poenaru Florin
title An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
title_short An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
title_full An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
title_fullStr An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
title_full_unstemmed An Alternative Periodization of Romanian History. A Research Agenda
title_sort alternative periodization of romanian history. a research agenda
publisher Sciendo
series Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
issn 2066-0464
publishDate 2016-06-01
description In this paper, I suggest an alternative form of periodization of Romanian history. My aim is not to move around historical posts; rather I propose a different way of understanding Romanian history as such. This is the research agenda. I seek to write a world history from the perspective of a peripheral place like Romania has been. Therefore, this is not simply an attempt to insert a local, neglected, silenced or distorted history into a wider, European, global story (that is, to discover the history of “people without history”), just as it is not another attempt to “provincialize Europe” in favour of a view from its repressed margins. Instead, following Coronil (2004), I believe it is indispensable to globalize the periphery, to understand its worldwide formation. My investigation draws upon the conceptual toolkit of world-system theory and its underlining philosophy of history (Wallerstein, 2011). In the same vein, the guiding principles of my periodization elaborate on Andre Gunder Frank’s insight that the exchange (or rather direct transfer) of surplus between societies is what links regions and societies as whole (Frank, 1978). The focus then shifts from a given society/state and its internal relations to the wider world-system, or world-economy, in which it is embedded. The unit of analysis is not a geographical location, but relations and networks and their historical development.
topic historical periodization
world-system theories
world-economy
romanian history
url https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2016-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT poenaruflorin analternativeperiodizationofromanianhistoryaresearchagenda
AT poenaruflorin alternativeperiodizationofromanianhistoryaresearchagenda
_version_ 1717811330715484160