Tocilizumab treatment in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective observational study

• Main Authors: Edmund Huang, Sharon Isonaka, Haoshu Yang, Erin Salce, Elisa Rosales, Stanley C. Jordan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2021-04-01
• Series: International Journal of Infectious Diseases
• Subjects: COVID-19; Tocilizumab; SARS-CoV2; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Cytokine release syndrome; Pneumonia
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221001430

Objective: Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines are observed in severe COVID-19 infections, and cytokine storm is associated with disease severity. Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, is used to treat chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome and may attenuate the dysregulated immune response in COVID-19. We compared outcomes among tocilizumab-treated and non-tocilizumab-treated critically ill COVID-19 patients. Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center investigating all patients admitted to the intensive care unit for COVID-19 who had a disposition from the hospital because of death or hospital discharge between March 1 and May 18, 2020 (n = 96). The percentages of death and secondary infections were compared between patients treated with tocilizumab (n = 55) and those who were not (n = 41). Measurements and main results: More tocilizumab-treated patients required mechanical ventilation (44/55, 80%) compared to non-treated patients (15/41, 37%; P < 0.001). Of 55 patients treated with tocilizumab, 32 (58%) were on mechanical ventilation at the time of administration, and 12 (22%) progressed to mechanical ventilation after treatment. Of patients treated with tocilizumab requiring mechanical ventilation, 30/44 (68%) were intubated within 1 day of administration. Fewer deaths were observed among tocilizumab-treated patients, both in the overall population (15% vs 37%; P = 0.02) and among the subgroup of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (14% vs 60%; P = 0.001). Secondary infections were not different between the 2 groups (tocilizumab: 31%, non-tocilizumab: 17%; P = 0.16) and were predominantly related to invasive devices, such as urinary and central venous catheters. Conclusions: Tocilizumab treatment was associated with fewer deaths compared to non-treatment despite predominantly being used in patients with more advanced respiratory disease.