The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Galina Mihailovna Andreeva, who was a creator of the Russian school of Social Psychology at the faculty of Moscow State University. Adreeva suggested that the psychologist’s main objective was to integrate scientific knowledge into the context of social chang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Khoroshilov D.A.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2019-09-01
Series:Социальная психология и общество
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/en/social_psy/2019/n3/Khoroshilov.shtml
id doaj-3a09cbb5179e4767b754838e74448c64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a09cbb5179e4767b754838e74448c642020-11-25T02:37:11ZrusMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationСоциальная психология и общество2221-15272311-70522019-09-0110319620110.17759/sps.2019100313The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. AndreevaKhoroshilov D.A.0Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, d.khoroshilov@gmail.com This paper is dedicated to the memory of Galina Mihailovna Andreeva, who was a creator of the Russian school of Social Psychology at the faculty of Moscow State University. Adreeva suggested that the psychologist’s main objective was to integrate scientific knowledge into the context of social changes and issues. She determined the main problem of Social Psychology as the problem of social cognition. Social cognition represents constructing the image of the social world, which is vicariously lived by people in their everyday life. This definition unites such theories as sociocultural approach (L. Vygotsky, A. Leontiev, A. Luria), K. Gergen’s social constructionism and cognitive psychology (S. Fiske). According to the ideas of Andreeva, the image of social world integrates micro- and marco-levels of social structure, what manifests in general directions of the discipline of Social Psychology: communication-groups-personality. Indeed, human personality is formed through group interactions, as well as his personal and social identity which are determined by the culture and by the society where we interact. The concepts elaborated by Andreeva greatly anticipated contemporary research on the perception of social space and time, collective emotions and experiences, as well as collective memory. Therefore, we see the need for an immediate revisit of her heritage in the context of the modern human sciences. http://psyjournals.ru/en/social_psy/2019/n3/Khoroshilov.shtml
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khoroshilov D.A.
spellingShingle Khoroshilov D.A.
The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
Социальная психология и общество
author_facet Khoroshilov D.A.
author_sort Khoroshilov D.A.
title The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
title_short The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
title_full The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
title_fullStr The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
title_full_unstemmed The continuity of the knowledge in Social Psychology, could it be possible? Commemoration to the 95th anniversary of G.M. Andreeva
title_sort continuity of the knowledge in social psychology, could it be possible? commemoration to the 95th anniversary of g.m. andreeva
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
series Социальная психология и общество
issn 2221-1527
2311-7052
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This paper is dedicated to the memory of Galina Mihailovna Andreeva, who was a creator of the Russian school of Social Psychology at the faculty of Moscow State University. Adreeva suggested that the psychologist’s main objective was to integrate scientific knowledge into the context of social changes and issues. She determined the main problem of Social Psychology as the problem of social cognition. Social cognition represents constructing the image of the social world, which is vicariously lived by people in their everyday life. This definition unites such theories as sociocultural approach (L. Vygotsky, A. Leontiev, A. Luria), K. Gergen’s social constructionism and cognitive psychology (S. Fiske). According to the ideas of Andreeva, the image of social world integrates micro- and marco-levels of social structure, what manifests in general directions of the discipline of Social Psychology: communication-groups-personality. Indeed, human personality is formed through group interactions, as well as his personal and social identity which are determined by the culture and by the society where we interact. The concepts elaborated by Andreeva greatly anticipated contemporary research on the perception of social space and time, collective emotions and experiences, as well as collective memory. Therefore, we see the need for an immediate revisit of her heritage in the context of the modern human sciences.
url http://psyjournals.ru/en/social_psy/2019/n3/Khoroshilov.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT khoroshilovda thecontinuityoftheknowledgeinsocialpsychologycoulditbepossiblecommemorationtothe95thanniversaryofgmandreeva
AT khoroshilovda continuityoftheknowledgeinsocialpsychologycoulditbepossiblecommemorationtothe95thanniversaryofgmandreeva
_version_ 1724796250346225664