The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation

Objective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miro Šimun Alebić, Nataša Stojanović, Marta Žuvić-Butorac
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Endocrinology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919
id doaj-39e5187d6b8f4467849772f14a81bae8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39e5187d6b8f4467849772f14a81bae82020-11-24T23:21:38ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Endocrinology1687-83371687-83452013-01-01201310.1155/2013/637919637919The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian StimulationMiro Šimun Alebić0Nataša Stojanović1Marta Žuvić-Butorac2Department of Human Reproduction, Merkur Teaching Hospital, 10 000 Zagreb, CroatiaInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Merkur Teaching Hospital, 10 000 Zagreb, CroatiaDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Rijeka, 51 000 Rijeka, CroatiaObjective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with low AMH level (<6.5 pmol/L) who underwent their first GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF/ICSI were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome measure was the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the models combining age and other potential predictive factors for the clinical pregnancy. Results. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per initiated cycles was 11.6%. For the prediction of clinical pregnancy, DHEAS and age showed AUC-ROC of 0.726 (95%CI 0.641–0.801) and 0.662 (95%CI 0.573–0.743), respectively (). The predictive accuracy of the model combining age and DHEAS (AUC-ROC 0.796; 95%CI 0.716–0.862) was significantly higher compared to that of age alone (). In patients <37.5 years with DHEAS  pmol/L, 60% (9/15) of all pregnancies were achieved with CPR of 37.5%. Conclusions. DHEAS appears to be predictive for clinical pregnancy in younger women (<37.5 years) with low AMH after the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Therefore, DHEAS-age model could refine the pretreatment counseling on pregnancy prospects following IVF.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miro Šimun Alebić
Nataša Stojanović
Marta Žuvić-Butorac
spellingShingle Miro Šimun Alebić
Nataša Stojanović
Marta Žuvić-Butorac
The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
International Journal of Endocrinology
author_facet Miro Šimun Alebić
Nataša Stojanović
Marta Žuvić-Butorac
author_sort Miro Šimun Alebić
title The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_short The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_full The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_fullStr The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed The IVF Outcome Counseling Based on the Model Combining DHEAS and Age in Patients with Low AMH Prior to the First Cycle of GnRH Antagonist Protocol of Ovarian Stimulation
title_sort ivf outcome counseling based on the model combining dheas and age in patients with low amh prior to the first cycle of gnrh antagonist protocol of ovarian stimulation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Endocrinology
issn 1687-8337
1687-8345
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Objective. To investigate the endocrine and/or clinical characteristics of women with low anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that could improve the accuracy of IVF outcome prediction based on the female age alone prior to the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Methods. Medical records of 129 patients with low AMH level (<6.5 pmol/L) who underwent their first GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF/ICSI were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome measure was the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the models combining age and other potential predictive factors for the clinical pregnancy. Results. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per initiated cycles was 11.6%. For the prediction of clinical pregnancy, DHEAS and age showed AUC-ROC of 0.726 (95%CI 0.641–0.801) and 0.662 (95%CI 0.573–0.743), respectively (). The predictive accuracy of the model combining age and DHEAS (AUC-ROC 0.796; 95%CI 0.716–0.862) was significantly higher compared to that of age alone (). In patients <37.5 years with DHEAS  pmol/L, 60% (9/15) of all pregnancies were achieved with CPR of 37.5%. Conclusions. DHEAS appears to be predictive for clinical pregnancy in younger women (<37.5 years) with low AMH after the first GnRH antagonist IVF cycle. Therefore, DHEAS-age model could refine the pretreatment counseling on pregnancy prospects following IVF.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/637919
work_keys_str_mv AT mirosimunalebic theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT natasastojanovic theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT martazuvicbutorac theivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT mirosimunalebic ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT natasastojanovic ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
AT martazuvicbutorac ivfoutcomecounselingbasedonthemodelcombiningdheasandageinpatientswithlowamhpriortothefirstcycleofgnrhantagonistprotocolofovarianstimulation
_version_ 1725570932063338496