Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those w...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lodz University Press
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Comparative Economic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084 |
id |
doaj-39daee62af364ebfa0736329518a4725 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39daee62af364ebfa0736329518a47252021-09-02T11:26:52ZengLodz University PressComparative Economic Research1508-20082082-67372015-12-01184637910.1515/cer-2015-00297084Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist TransformationZenonas Norkus0Vilnius University, Lithuania., Faculty of Philosophy, Department of SociologyAfter more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084post-communismcatching up growthqualitative comparative analysismarket reformslocationeu membershipwarnatural resourcesstatehood |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zenonas Norkus |
spellingShingle |
Zenonas Norkus Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation Comparative Economic Research post-communism catching up growth qualitative comparative analysis market reforms location eu membership war natural resources statehood |
author_facet |
Zenonas Norkus |
author_sort |
Zenonas Norkus |
title |
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation |
title_short |
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation |
title_full |
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation |
title_fullStr |
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation |
title_sort |
catching up and falling behind: four puzzles after two decades of post-communist transformation |
publisher |
Lodz University Press |
series |
Comparative Economic Research |
issn |
1508-2008 2082-6737 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries. |
topic |
post-communism catching up growth qualitative comparative analysis market reforms location eu membership war natural resources statehood |
url |
https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zenonasnorkus catchingupandfallingbehindfourpuzzlesaftertwodecadesofpostcommunisttransformation |
_version_ |
1721176013363216384 |