Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation

After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zenonas Norkus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2015-12-01
Series:Comparative Economic Research
Subjects:
war
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084
id doaj-39daee62af364ebfa0736329518a4725
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39daee62af364ebfa0736329518a47252021-09-02T11:26:52ZengLodz University PressComparative Economic Research1508-20082082-67372015-12-01184637910.1515/cer-2015-00297084Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist TransformationZenonas Norkus0Vilnius University, Lithuania., Faculty of Philosophy, Department of SociologyAfter more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084post-communismcatching up growthqualitative comparative analysismarket reformslocationeu membershipwarnatural resourcesstatehood
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zenonas Norkus
spellingShingle Zenonas Norkus
Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
Comparative Economic Research
post-communism
catching up growth
qualitative comparative analysis
market reforms
location
eu membership
war
natural resources
statehood
author_facet Zenonas Norkus
author_sort Zenonas Norkus
title Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
title_short Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
title_full Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
title_fullStr Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
title_full_unstemmed Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation
title_sort catching up and falling behind: four puzzles after two decades of post-communist transformation
publisher Lodz University Press
series Comparative Economic Research
issn 1508-2008
2082-6737
publishDate 2015-12-01
description After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries.
topic post-communism
catching up growth
qualitative comparative analysis
market reforms
location
eu membership
war
natural resources
statehood
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/CER/article/view/7084
work_keys_str_mv AT zenonasnorkus catchingupandfallingbehindfourpuzzlesaftertwodecadesofpostcommunisttransformation
_version_ 1721176013363216384