Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal

Consistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a revie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rune Njøs, Stig-Erik Jakobsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-01-01
Series:Regional Studies, Regional Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094
id doaj-39d87efd6a9f46b1bde11f0eb2b511e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39d87efd6a9f46b1bde11f0eb2b511e62020-11-25T04:07:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRegional Studies, Regional Science2168-13762016-01-013114616910.1080/21681376.2015.11380941138094Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewalRune Njøs0Stig-Erik Jakobsen1Bergen University CollegeBergen University CollegeConsistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a review of the current literature on clusters and innovation, and informed by evolutionary thought, we argue that such constellations of specialized clusters may hamper the long-term innovation ability of regions. In a conceptual discussion of cluster evolution and its links to innovation and regional path renewal, we argue that special emphasis – both theoretical and political – has been placed on the geographical scale of clusters, but there has been less emphasis on scope. Accordingly, we present three theory-based strategies for cluster evolution and link these to regional development and innovation by assessing their impact on regional path renewal. We illustrate our argument empirically using examples from the Norwegian Centre of Expertise (NCE) cluster programme.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094cluster policycluster evolutionregional renewalscalescope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rune Njøs
Stig-Erik Jakobsen
spellingShingle Rune Njøs
Stig-Erik Jakobsen
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
Regional Studies, Regional Science
cluster policy
cluster evolution
regional renewal
scale
scope
author_facet Rune Njøs
Stig-Erik Jakobsen
author_sort Rune Njøs
title Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
title_short Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
title_full Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
title_fullStr Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
title_full_unstemmed Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
title_sort cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Regional Studies, Regional Science
issn 2168-1376
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Consistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a review of the current literature on clusters and innovation, and informed by evolutionary thought, we argue that such constellations of specialized clusters may hamper the long-term innovation ability of regions. In a conceptual discussion of cluster evolution and its links to innovation and regional path renewal, we argue that special emphasis – both theoretical and political – has been placed on the geographical scale of clusters, but there has been less emphasis on scope. Accordingly, we present three theory-based strategies for cluster evolution and link these to regional development and innovation by assessing their impact on regional path renewal. We illustrate our argument empirically using examples from the Norwegian Centre of Expertise (NCE) cluster programme.
topic cluster policy
cluster evolution
regional renewal
scale
scope
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094
work_keys_str_mv AT runenjøs clusterpolicyandregionaldevelopmentscalescopeandrenewal
AT stigerikjakobsen clusterpolicyandregionaldevelopmentscalescopeandrenewal
_version_ 1724428339626639360