Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal
Consistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a revie...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Regional Studies, Regional Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094 |
id |
doaj-39d87efd6a9f46b1bde11f0eb2b511e6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39d87efd6a9f46b1bde11f0eb2b511e62020-11-25T04:07:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRegional Studies, Regional Science2168-13762016-01-013114616910.1080/21681376.2015.11380941138094Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewalRune Njøs0Stig-Erik Jakobsen1Bergen University CollegeBergen University CollegeConsistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a review of the current literature on clusters and innovation, and informed by evolutionary thought, we argue that such constellations of specialized clusters may hamper the long-term innovation ability of regions. In a conceptual discussion of cluster evolution and its links to innovation and regional path renewal, we argue that special emphasis – both theoretical and political – has been placed on the geographical scale of clusters, but there has been less emphasis on scope. Accordingly, we present three theory-based strategies for cluster evolution and link these to regional development and innovation by assessing their impact on regional path renewal. We illustrate our argument empirically using examples from the Norwegian Centre of Expertise (NCE) cluster programme.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094cluster policycluster evolutionregional renewalscalescope |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rune Njøs Stig-Erik Jakobsen |
spellingShingle |
Rune Njøs Stig-Erik Jakobsen Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal Regional Studies, Regional Science cluster policy cluster evolution regional renewal scale scope |
author_facet |
Rune Njøs Stig-Erik Jakobsen |
author_sort |
Rune Njøs |
title |
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
title_short |
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
title_full |
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
title_fullStr |
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
title_sort |
cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Regional Studies, Regional Science |
issn |
2168-1376 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Consistent with Marshallian/Porterian theories, the Norwegian cluster policy has been linked to the development of specialized regional industry environments. Cluster projects are relatively sector-specific entities often supporting (already) strong regional industries and sectors. Following a review of the current literature on clusters and innovation, and informed by evolutionary thought, we argue that such constellations of specialized clusters may hamper the long-term innovation ability of regions. In a conceptual discussion of cluster evolution and its links to innovation and regional path renewal, we argue that special emphasis – both theoretical and political – has been placed on the geographical scale of clusters, but there has been less emphasis on scope. Accordingly, we present three theory-based strategies for cluster evolution and link these to regional development and innovation by assessing their impact on regional path renewal. We illustrate our argument empirically using examples from the Norwegian Centre of Expertise (NCE) cluster programme. |
topic |
cluster policy cluster evolution regional renewal scale scope |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT runenjøs clusterpolicyandregionaldevelopmentscalescopeandrenewal AT stigerikjakobsen clusterpolicyandregionaldevelopmentscalescopeandrenewal |
_version_ |
1724428339626639360 |