Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.

Cellular immunotherapy has appeared to be a promising modality for the treatment of malignant tumor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cellular immunotherapy combined with minimally invasive therapy.We searched PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library through March 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Ding, Ying Wang, Jiachang Chi, Tao Wang, Xiaoyin Tang, Dan Cui, Qijun Qian, Bo Zhai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179243?pdf=render
id doaj-39c6f564e4e24cefac27ff6d821f04b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39c6f564e4e24cefac27ff6d821f04b92020-11-24T22:11:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011112e016879810.1371/journal.pone.0168798Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.Min DingYing WangJiachang ChiTao WangXiaoyin TangDan CuiQijun QianBo ZhaiCellular immunotherapy has appeared to be a promising modality for the treatment of malignant tumor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cellular immunotherapy combined with minimally invasive therapy.We searched PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library through March 2016 for relevant studies. Short-term efficacy (the disease control rate, the control rate of quality life and the AFP descent rate) and long-term efficacy (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate) were compared as the major outcome measures. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.A total of 1174 references in 3 databases were found of which 19 individual studies with 1774 HCC patients enrolled in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that cellular immunotherapy combined with minimally-invasive treatment significantly improved the measures of short-term response (the disease control rate (OR = 5.91, P = 0.007), the control rate of quality lift (OR = 3.38, P = 0.003) and the AFP descent rate (OR = 4.48, P = 0.02)). Also higher 6-month PFS (OR = 2.78, P = 0.05), ≥12-month PFS (OR = 3.56, P<0.00001) rate and 6-month OS (OR = 2.81, P = 0.0009), 12-month OS (OR = 3.05, P<0.00001) and 24-month OS (OR = 3.52, P<0.0001) rate were observed in patients undergoing cellular immunotherapy.This meta-analysis suggested that cellular immunotherapy is a feasible adjuvant treatment that could be beneficial for the improvement of the clinical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after minimally invasive treatment, including short-term response and long-term survival.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179243?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Min Ding
Ying Wang
Jiachang Chi
Tao Wang
Xiaoyin Tang
Dan Cui
Qijun Qian
Bo Zhai
spellingShingle Min Ding
Ying Wang
Jiachang Chi
Tao Wang
Xiaoyin Tang
Dan Cui
Qijun Qian
Bo Zhai
Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Min Ding
Ying Wang
Jiachang Chi
Tao Wang
Xiaoyin Tang
Dan Cui
Qijun Qian
Bo Zhai
author_sort Min Ding
title Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
title_short Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
title_full Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
title_fullStr Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
title_full_unstemmed Is Adjuvant Cellular Immunotherapy Essential after TACE-Predominant Minimally-Invasive Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Studies Including 1774 Patients.
title_sort is adjuvant cellular immunotherapy essential after tace-predominant minimally-invasive treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma? a systematic meta-analysis of studies including 1774 patients.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Cellular immunotherapy has appeared to be a promising modality for the treatment of malignant tumor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cellular immunotherapy combined with minimally invasive therapy.We searched PubMed, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library through March 2016 for relevant studies. Short-term efficacy (the disease control rate, the control rate of quality life and the AFP descent rate) and long-term efficacy (overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate) were compared as the major outcome measures. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.A total of 1174 references in 3 databases were found of which 19 individual studies with 1774 HCC patients enrolled in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that cellular immunotherapy combined with minimally-invasive treatment significantly improved the measures of short-term response (the disease control rate (OR = 5.91, P = 0.007), the control rate of quality lift (OR = 3.38, P = 0.003) and the AFP descent rate (OR = 4.48, P = 0.02)). Also higher 6-month PFS (OR = 2.78, P = 0.05), ≥12-month PFS (OR = 3.56, P<0.00001) rate and 6-month OS (OR = 2.81, P = 0.0009), 12-month OS (OR = 3.05, P<0.00001) and 24-month OS (OR = 3.52, P<0.0001) rate were observed in patients undergoing cellular immunotherapy.This meta-analysis suggested that cellular immunotherapy is a feasible adjuvant treatment that could be beneficial for the improvement of the clinical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after minimally invasive treatment, including short-term response and long-term survival.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5179243?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT minding isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT yingwang isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT jiachangchi isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT taowang isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT xiaoyintang isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT dancui isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT qijunqian isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
AT bozhai isadjuvantcellularimmunotherapyessentialaftertacepredominantminimallyinvasivetreatmentforhepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicmetaanalysisofstudiesincluding1774patients
_version_ 1725805686229565440