Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles

The second half of the 16th century marks an unprecedented vogue of demonology. The authors of theological treatises or witchcraft manuals offer new aesthetic insights of darkness focused around the sabbath. They actively participate in the ideological construct of an anti-church ruled by Satan – a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pierre Kapitaniak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone 2005-05-01
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/2841
id doaj-39a6f8e9c09c4c25b8696d70bbad8738
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39a6f8e9c09c4c25b8696d70bbad87382020-11-25T00:46:12ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502005-05-01710.4000/episteme.2841Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe sièclesPierre KapitaniakThe second half of the 16th century marks an unprecedented vogue of demonology. The authors of theological treatises or witchcraft manuals offer new aesthetic insights of darkness focused around the sabbath. They actively participate in the ideological construct of an anti-church ruled by Satan – a mirror image of the catholic rites with witches as officiating priests. The present paper offers a synthesis of Stuart Clark’s alternative view of these changes, which minimises the active role played by demonological treatises in the witch hunts. Thus, demonology must be associated with the advancement of natural philosophy, rather than with its stagnation or decline. Clark rejects the modern construction of a direct correlation between the rise of science and the decline of magic, and postulates that demonology provided a privileged ground for epistemological questioning of the evolving science. Rather than too credulous, these authors appear to have been engaged in a task of « scientific demystification », endeavouring to determine the limits of Satan and his demons, according to a system of categories built around two oppositions : real/illusory and demonic/non-demonic. Therefore the main cause of the decline of demonology at the dawn of the 18th century is not so much the growing scientific scepticism, but the shift from theistic natural philosophy towards deistic rational theology in the 1740s.http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/2841
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pierre Kapitaniak
spellingShingle Pierre Kapitaniak
Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
Etudes Epistémè
author_facet Pierre Kapitaniak
author_sort Pierre Kapitaniak
title Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
title_short Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
title_full Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
title_fullStr Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
title_full_unstemmed Du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
title_sort du progrès et de la promotion des démons : démonologie et philosophie naturelle dans l’épistémè européenne aux xvie et xviie siècles
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
series Etudes Epistémè
issn 1634-0450
publishDate 2005-05-01
description The second half of the 16th century marks an unprecedented vogue of demonology. The authors of theological treatises or witchcraft manuals offer new aesthetic insights of darkness focused around the sabbath. They actively participate in the ideological construct of an anti-church ruled by Satan – a mirror image of the catholic rites with witches as officiating priests. The present paper offers a synthesis of Stuart Clark’s alternative view of these changes, which minimises the active role played by demonological treatises in the witch hunts. Thus, demonology must be associated with the advancement of natural philosophy, rather than with its stagnation or decline. Clark rejects the modern construction of a direct correlation between the rise of science and the decline of magic, and postulates that demonology provided a privileged ground for epistemological questioning of the evolving science. Rather than too credulous, these authors appear to have been engaged in a task of « scientific demystification », endeavouring to determine the limits of Satan and his demons, according to a system of categories built around two oppositions : real/illusory and demonic/non-demonic. Therefore the main cause of the decline of demonology at the dawn of the 18th century is not so much the growing scientific scepticism, but the shift from theistic natural philosophy towards deistic rational theology in the 1740s.
url http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/2841
work_keys_str_mv AT pierrekapitaniak duprogresetdelapromotiondesdemonsdemonologieetphilosophienaturelledanslepistemeeuropeenneauxxvieetxviiesiecles
_version_ 1725266148824449024