Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation

Abstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. R. de Paula, A. R. F. Martinon, A. O. Moraes, C. Carrano, A. C. Neto, P. Doherty, K. Groves, C. E. Valladares, G. Crowley, I. Azeem, A. Reynolds, D. M. Akos, T. Walter, T. L. Beach, J.‐M. Slewaegen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021-02-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314
id doaj-39a5f79ed45649de82634ac5d0d1b1d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39a5f79ed45649de82634ac5d0d1b1d42021-02-25T22:00:33ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842021-02-0182n/an/a10.1029/2020EA001314Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong ScintillationE. R. de Paula0A. R. F. Martinon1A. O. Moraes2C. Carrano3A. C. Neto4P. Doherty5K. Groves6C. E. Valladares7G. Crowley8I. Azeem9A. Reynolds10D. M. Akos11T. Walter12T. L. Beach13J.‐M. Slewaegen14National Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilNational Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilBrazilian Institute of Aeronautics and Space—IAE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USANational Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USAInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USAHanson Center for Space Sciences The University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAStanford University Stanford CA USAStanford University Stanford CA USACreare LLC Hanover NH USASeptentrio Leuven BelgiumAbstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plasma depletion structures called Equatorial Plasma Bubbles with embedded smaller structures on their walls. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) L1 band frequency is sensitive to irregularities of the size of 300–400 m in the first Fresnel zone, which cause scattering and diffraction of the signal and produce amplitude and/or phase scintillation. Severe scintillation of GNSS signals can in turn cause loss of lock of the receiver code and/or carrier loops. As a result, GNSS navigation and positioning solution can be adversely affected by the ionospheric scintillation. There are multiple GNSS receivers designed to monitor scintillations. These receivers are based on different hardware designs and use different methodologies to process the raw data. When using simultaneous data from different GNSS scintillation monitors it is important to evaluate and compare their performances under similar scintillation conditions. The scintillation monitoring techniques may be useful for many applications that use GNSS signal. The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of six different GNSS receivers located at São José dos Campos (23.1°S, 45.8°W, dip latitude 17.3°S) during moderate and strong scintillation activity. The amplitude (S4) and phase (σϕ) scintillation indexes from these receivers were analyzed and compared for the nights February 20–21 and November 27–28, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314amplitude and phase scintillation indexesGNSS receiver performanceionospheric irregularitiesionospheric scintillationscintillation monitor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. R. de Paula
A. R. F. Martinon
A. O. Moraes
C. Carrano
A. C. Neto
P. Doherty
K. Groves
C. E. Valladares
G. Crowley
I. Azeem
A. Reynolds
D. M. Akos
T. Walter
T. L. Beach
J.‐M. Slewaegen
spellingShingle E. R. de Paula
A. R. F. Martinon
A. O. Moraes
C. Carrano
A. C. Neto
P. Doherty
K. Groves
C. E. Valladares
G. Crowley
I. Azeem
A. Reynolds
D. M. Akos
T. Walter
T. L. Beach
J.‐M. Slewaegen
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
Earth and Space Science
amplitude and phase scintillation indexes
GNSS receiver performance
ionospheric irregularities
ionospheric scintillation
scintillation monitor
author_facet E. R. de Paula
A. R. F. Martinon
A. O. Moraes
C. Carrano
A. C. Neto
P. Doherty
K. Groves
C. E. Valladares
G. Crowley
I. Azeem
A. Reynolds
D. M. Akos
T. Walter
T. L. Beach
J.‐M. Slewaegen
author_sort E. R. de Paula
title Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
title_short Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
title_full Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
title_fullStr Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
title_full_unstemmed Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
title_sort performance of 6 different global navigation satellite system receivers at low latitude under moderate and strong scintillation
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth and Space Science
issn 2333-5084
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plasma depletion structures called Equatorial Plasma Bubbles with embedded smaller structures on their walls. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) L1 band frequency is sensitive to irregularities of the size of 300–400 m in the first Fresnel zone, which cause scattering and diffraction of the signal and produce amplitude and/or phase scintillation. Severe scintillation of GNSS signals can in turn cause loss of lock of the receiver code and/or carrier loops. As a result, GNSS navigation and positioning solution can be adversely affected by the ionospheric scintillation. There are multiple GNSS receivers designed to monitor scintillations. These receivers are based on different hardware designs and use different methodologies to process the raw data. When using simultaneous data from different GNSS scintillation monitors it is important to evaluate and compare their performances under similar scintillation conditions. The scintillation monitoring techniques may be useful for many applications that use GNSS signal. The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of six different GNSS receivers located at São José dos Campos (23.1°S, 45.8°W, dip latitude 17.3°S) during moderate and strong scintillation activity. The amplitude (S4) and phase (σϕ) scintillation indexes from these receivers were analyzed and compared for the nights February 20–21 and November 27–28, 2013.
topic amplitude and phase scintillation indexes
GNSS receiver performance
ionospheric irregularities
ionospheric scintillation
scintillation monitor
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314
work_keys_str_mv AT erdepaula performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT arfmartinon performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT aomoraes performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT ccarrano performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT acneto performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT pdoherty performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT kgroves performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT cevalladares performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT gcrowley performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT iazeem performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT areynolds performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT dmakos performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT twalter performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT tlbeach performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
AT jmslewaegen performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation
_version_ 1724250947604971520