Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation
Abstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plas...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Earth and Space Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314 |
id |
doaj-39a5f79ed45649de82634ac5d0d1b1d4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39a5f79ed45649de82634ac5d0d1b1d42021-02-25T22:00:33ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842021-02-0182n/an/a10.1029/2020EA001314Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong ScintillationE. R. de Paula0A. R. F. Martinon1A. O. Moraes2C. Carrano3A. C. Neto4P. Doherty5K. Groves6C. E. Valladares7G. Crowley8I. Azeem9A. Reynolds10D. M. Akos11T. Walter12T. L. Beach13J.‐M. Slewaegen14National Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilNational Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilBrazilian Institute of Aeronautics and Space—IAE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USANational Institute for Space Research‐INPE Sao Jose dos Campos BrazilInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USAInstitute for Scientific Research Boston College Newton MA USAHanson Center for Space Sciences The University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAAtmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA) Louisville CO USAStanford University Stanford CA USAStanford University Stanford CA USACreare LLC Hanover NH USASeptentrio Leuven BelgiumAbstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plasma depletion structures called Equatorial Plasma Bubbles with embedded smaller structures on their walls. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) L1 band frequency is sensitive to irregularities of the size of 300–400 m in the first Fresnel zone, which cause scattering and diffraction of the signal and produce amplitude and/or phase scintillation. Severe scintillation of GNSS signals can in turn cause loss of lock of the receiver code and/or carrier loops. As a result, GNSS navigation and positioning solution can be adversely affected by the ionospheric scintillation. There are multiple GNSS receivers designed to monitor scintillations. These receivers are based on different hardware designs and use different methodologies to process the raw data. When using simultaneous data from different GNSS scintillation monitors it is important to evaluate and compare their performances under similar scintillation conditions. The scintillation monitoring techniques may be useful for many applications that use GNSS signal. The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of six different GNSS receivers located at São José dos Campos (23.1°S, 45.8°W, dip latitude 17.3°S) during moderate and strong scintillation activity. The amplitude (S4) and phase (σϕ) scintillation indexes from these receivers were analyzed and compared for the nights February 20–21 and November 27–28, 2013.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314amplitude and phase scintillation indexesGNSS receiver performanceionospheric irregularitiesionospheric scintillationscintillation monitor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. R. de Paula A. R. F. Martinon A. O. Moraes C. Carrano A. C. Neto P. Doherty K. Groves C. E. Valladares G. Crowley I. Azeem A. Reynolds D. M. Akos T. Walter T. L. Beach J.‐M. Slewaegen |
spellingShingle |
E. R. de Paula A. R. F. Martinon A. O. Moraes C. Carrano A. C. Neto P. Doherty K. Groves C. E. Valladares G. Crowley I. Azeem A. Reynolds D. M. Akos T. Walter T. L. Beach J.‐M. Slewaegen Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation Earth and Space Science amplitude and phase scintillation indexes GNSS receiver performance ionospheric irregularities ionospheric scintillation scintillation monitor |
author_facet |
E. R. de Paula A. R. F. Martinon A. O. Moraes C. Carrano A. C. Neto P. Doherty K. Groves C. E. Valladares G. Crowley I. Azeem A. Reynolds D. M. Akos T. Walter T. L. Beach J.‐M. Slewaegen |
author_sort |
E. R. de Paula |
title |
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation |
title_short |
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation |
title_full |
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation |
title_fullStr |
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of 6 Different Global Navigation Satellite System Receivers at Low Latitude Under Moderate and Strong Scintillation |
title_sort |
performance of 6 different global navigation satellite system receivers at low latitude under moderate and strong scintillation |
publisher |
American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
series |
Earth and Space Science |
issn |
2333-5084 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Abstract After sunset, in the equatorial regions ionospheric plasma irregularities are generated due to the generalized Rayleigh‐Taylor instability. Under favorable conditions these irregularities develop in the equatorial region while mapping along the magnetic field lines giving rise to large plasma depletion structures called Equatorial Plasma Bubbles with embedded smaller structures on their walls. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) L1 band frequency is sensitive to irregularities of the size of 300–400 m in the first Fresnel zone, which cause scattering and diffraction of the signal and produce amplitude and/or phase scintillation. Severe scintillation of GNSS signals can in turn cause loss of lock of the receiver code and/or carrier loops. As a result, GNSS navigation and positioning solution can be adversely affected by the ionospheric scintillation. There are multiple GNSS receivers designed to monitor scintillations. These receivers are based on different hardware designs and use different methodologies to process the raw data. When using simultaneous data from different GNSS scintillation monitors it is important to evaluate and compare their performances under similar scintillation conditions. The scintillation monitoring techniques may be useful for many applications that use GNSS signal. The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of six different GNSS receivers located at São José dos Campos (23.1°S, 45.8°W, dip latitude 17.3°S) during moderate and strong scintillation activity. The amplitude (S4) and phase (σϕ) scintillation indexes from these receivers were analyzed and compared for the nights February 20–21 and November 27–28, 2013. |
topic |
amplitude and phase scintillation indexes GNSS receiver performance ionospheric irregularities ionospheric scintillation scintillation monitor |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001314 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT erdepaula performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT arfmartinon performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT aomoraes performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT ccarrano performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT acneto performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT pdoherty performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT kgroves performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT cevalladares performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT gcrowley performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT iazeem performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT areynolds performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT dmakos performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT twalter performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT tlbeach performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation AT jmslewaegen performanceof6differentglobalnavigationsatellitesystemreceiversatlowlatitudeundermoderateandstrongscintillation |
_version_ |
1724250947604971520 |