Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique

Taking into account the issue of representations in geopolitics is not as recent as we think in France. United States, "the behaviorist revolution" has, immediately after the Second World War generated a new school, that of the Cognitive Geopolitics, which incorporates the teachings of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Criekemans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes 2011-02-01
Series:L'Espace Politique
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/1723
id doaj-39a36427cc0547a4bf12e8836b23dc3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39a36427cc0547a4bf12e8836b23dc3b2020-11-24T23:10:04ZengUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdennesL'Espace Politique1958-55002011-02-011210.4000/espacepolitique.1723Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitiqueDavid CriekemansTaking into account the issue of representations in geopolitics is not as recent as we think in France. United States, "the behaviorist revolution" has, immediately after the Second World War generated a new school, that of the Cognitive Geopolitics, which incorporates the teachings of the behavioral sciences. It is henceforth regarded with Kenneth Boulding (Boulding, 1971) that: "People whose decisions determine the policies and actions of nations do not meet the" objective "facts of the situation ... but to their" image "of the situation. It's how they think the world is not what it actually determines their attitude. " But the originators of the approach are Harold and Margaret Sprout, and it is worth recalling the importance of their contribution. According to them, the reality of the world is a complex formed by a real hardware and a multitude of performances that relativize the first. That is why they differ for each player, between an operational environment and psychological environment. For constructivist authors involved aware of the Critical Geopolitics, everything is played at the second type of environment, but with a double feature. The first, negative, is that they perceive in the psychological environment of the cultural and political actors capable of bringing to seek transcendence in physical space. What would be the major defect of geopolitics to Mackinder. The second, positive, is that this environment is also intersubjective, and therefore the players that build reality, are able to amend it and normativisation. Finally, by combining the suggestions of the two currents to previous contributions of other schools of thought, it seems possible to envisage a geopolitical understanding. Mots clés.http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/1723behaviorismenvironmentimageintersubjectivitypsychologyrepresentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Criekemans
spellingShingle David Criekemans
Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
L'Espace Politique
behaviorism
environment
image
intersubjectivity
psychology
representation
author_facet David Criekemans
author_sort David Criekemans
title Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
title_short Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
title_full Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
title_fullStr Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
title_full_unstemmed Réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
title_sort réhabilitation et rénovation en matière de pensée géopolitique
publisher Université de Reims Champagne-Ardennes
series L'Espace Politique
issn 1958-5500
publishDate 2011-02-01
description Taking into account the issue of representations in geopolitics is not as recent as we think in France. United States, "the behaviorist revolution" has, immediately after the Second World War generated a new school, that of the Cognitive Geopolitics, which incorporates the teachings of the behavioral sciences. It is henceforth regarded with Kenneth Boulding (Boulding, 1971) that: "People whose decisions determine the policies and actions of nations do not meet the" objective "facts of the situation ... but to their" image "of the situation. It's how they think the world is not what it actually determines their attitude. " But the originators of the approach are Harold and Margaret Sprout, and it is worth recalling the importance of their contribution. According to them, the reality of the world is a complex formed by a real hardware and a multitude of performances that relativize the first. That is why they differ for each player, between an operational environment and psychological environment. For constructivist authors involved aware of the Critical Geopolitics, everything is played at the second type of environment, but with a double feature. The first, negative, is that they perceive in the psychological environment of the cultural and political actors capable of bringing to seek transcendence in physical space. What would be the major defect of geopolitics to Mackinder. The second, positive, is that this environment is also intersubjective, and therefore the players that build reality, are able to amend it and normativisation. Finally, by combining the suggestions of the two currents to previous contributions of other schools of thought, it seems possible to envisage a geopolitical understanding. Mots clés.
topic behaviorism
environment
image
intersubjectivity
psychology
representation
url http://journals.openedition.org/espacepolitique/1723
work_keys_str_mv AT davidcriekemans rehabilitationetrenovationenmatieredepenseegeopolitique
_version_ 1725608264268251136