Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population

Esthetic features are different from one race to another, and this should be considered during the treatment planning. The great variance in soft tissue drape of the human face complicates accurate assessment. The nose-lip-chin relationships are exceedingly important in determining the facial esthet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kohila Kandhasamy, Neetika Mukhija Prabu, Sivaraj Sivanmalai, Pannaikadu Somasundaram Prabu, Abraham Philip, Jwala C Chiramel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2012;volume=4;issue=6;spage=313;epage=315;aulast=Kandhasamy
id doaj-39a00619ff7b44d2bd7f15b814d9a2fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39a00619ff7b44d2bd7f15b814d9a2fb2020-11-24T23:06:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74060976-48792012-01-014631331510.4103/0975-7406.100284Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam populationKohila KandhasamyNeetika Mukhija PrabuSivaraj SivanmalaiPannaikadu Somasundaram PrabuAbraham PhilipJwala C ChiramelEsthetic features are different from one race to another, and this should be considered during the treatment planning. The great variance in soft tissue drape of the human face complicates accurate assessment. The nose-lip-chin relationships are exceedingly important in determining the facial esthetics. One important soft tissue parameter in orthodontic diagnosis is the nasolabial angle. The purpose of this study was to establish norms for nasolabial angle as proposed by Fitzgerald for the Komarapalayam population. Normative data for the three nasolabial parameters were produced from a sample of 40 (20 male and 20 female) adults determined by the authors to have well-balanced faces. Mean and standard deviation values from this pooled sample demonstrated a lower border of the nose to Frankfort horizontal plane angle of 18° ± 7°, upper lip to Frankfort horizontal plane angle of 98° ± 5°, and nasolabial angle of 116° ± 10°. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the values for men and women in this study, but men did have a slightly larger nasolabial angle.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2012;volume=4;issue=6;spage=313;epage=315;aulast=KandhasamyCephalometricFrankfort horizontal planenasolabial angle
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kohila Kandhasamy
Neetika Mukhija Prabu
Sivaraj Sivanmalai
Pannaikadu Somasundaram Prabu
Abraham Philip
Jwala C Chiramel
spellingShingle Kohila Kandhasamy
Neetika Mukhija Prabu
Sivaraj Sivanmalai
Pannaikadu Somasundaram Prabu
Abraham Philip
Jwala C Chiramel
Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Cephalometric
Frankfort horizontal plane
nasolabial angle
author_facet Kohila Kandhasamy
Neetika Mukhija Prabu
Sivaraj Sivanmalai
Pannaikadu Somasundaram Prabu
Abraham Philip
Jwala C Chiramel
author_sort Kohila Kandhasamy
title Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
title_short Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
title_full Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
title_fullStr Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population
title_sort evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the komarapalayam population
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
issn 0975-7406
0976-4879
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Esthetic features are different from one race to another, and this should be considered during the treatment planning. The great variance in soft tissue drape of the human face complicates accurate assessment. The nose-lip-chin relationships are exceedingly important in determining the facial esthetics. One important soft tissue parameter in orthodontic diagnosis is the nasolabial angle. The purpose of this study was to establish norms for nasolabial angle as proposed by Fitzgerald for the Komarapalayam population. Normative data for the three nasolabial parameters were produced from a sample of 40 (20 male and 20 female) adults determined by the authors to have well-balanced faces. Mean and standard deviation values from this pooled sample demonstrated a lower border of the nose to Frankfort horizontal plane angle of 18° ± 7°, upper lip to Frankfort horizontal plane angle of 98° ± 5°, and nasolabial angle of 116° ± 10°. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the values for men and women in this study, but men did have a slightly larger nasolabial angle.
topic Cephalometric
Frankfort horizontal plane
nasolabial angle
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2012;volume=4;issue=6;spage=313;epage=315;aulast=Kandhasamy
work_keys_str_mv AT kohilakandhasamy evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
AT neetikamukhijaprabu evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
AT sivarajsivanmalai evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
AT pannaikadusomasundaramprabu evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
AT abrahamphilip evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
AT jwalacchiramel evaluationofthenasolabialangleofthekomarapalayampopulation
_version_ 1725622596378034176