Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review

In a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tilmann Betsch, Leonie Aßmann, Andreas Glöckner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-06-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038
id doaj-39980cc9c6e24d46a32373d7ae1511f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39980cc9c6e24d46a32373d7ae1511f72020-11-25T03:20:54ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402020-06-0166e04259Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned reviewTilmann Betsch0Leonie Aßmann1Andreas Glöckner2Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Germany; Corresponding author.Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, GermanyIn a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). Additionally, we measured 14 other potential predictors that were found to correlate with paranormal beliefs in prior research (e.g., ontological confusion). Although cognitive ability and the big-six explained 10% of the variance in individual belief, ontological confusion and causality understanding also were significant predictors in regression analyses. The resulting model, explaining 19 % of variance, consists of ontological confusion, cognitive ability (negative correlation), openness to new experiences, emotionality, conscientiousness (neg. corr.) and causality understanding (neg. corr.). We discuss the findings with reference to two hypothetical factors that drive individuals' acceptance of paranormal beliefs, inclination for story-telling, and tendency to evaluate belief content in terms of reason and conscientious evaluation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038PsychologyParanormal beliefsEsoterismPersonalityIndividual Differences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tilmann Betsch
Leonie Aßmann
Andreas Glöckner
spellingShingle Tilmann Betsch
Leonie Aßmann
Andreas Glöckner
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
Heliyon
Psychology
Paranormal beliefs
Esoterism
Personality
Individual Differences
author_facet Tilmann Betsch
Leonie Aßmann
Andreas Glöckner
author_sort Tilmann Betsch
title Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
title_short Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
title_full Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
title_fullStr Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
title_full_unstemmed Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
title_sort paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
publisher Elsevier
series Heliyon
issn 2405-8440
publishDate 2020-06-01
description In a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). Additionally, we measured 14 other potential predictors that were found to correlate with paranormal beliefs in prior research (e.g., ontological confusion). Although cognitive ability and the big-six explained 10% of the variance in individual belief, ontological confusion and causality understanding also were significant predictors in regression analyses. The resulting model, explaining 19 % of variance, consists of ontological confusion, cognitive ability (negative correlation), openness to new experiences, emotionality, conscientiousness (neg. corr.) and causality understanding (neg. corr.). We discuss the findings with reference to two hypothetical factors that drive individuals' acceptance of paranormal beliefs, inclination for story-telling, and tendency to evaluate belief content in terms of reason and conscientious evaluation.
topic Psychology
Paranormal beliefs
Esoterism
Personality
Individual Differences
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038
work_keys_str_mv AT tilmannbetsch paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview
AT leonieaßmann paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview
AT andreasglockner paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview
_version_ 1724615798095347712