Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review
In a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). A...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Heliyon |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038 |
id |
doaj-39980cc9c6e24d46a32373d7ae1511f7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39980cc9c6e24d46a32373d7ae1511f72020-11-25T03:20:54ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402020-06-0166e04259Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned reviewTilmann Betsch0Leonie Aßmann1Andreas Glöckner2Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Germany; Corresponding author.Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, GermanyIn a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). Additionally, we measured 14 other potential predictors that were found to correlate with paranormal beliefs in prior research (e.g., ontological confusion). Although cognitive ability and the big-six explained 10% of the variance in individual belief, ontological confusion and causality understanding also were significant predictors in regression analyses. The resulting model, explaining 19 % of variance, consists of ontological confusion, cognitive ability (negative correlation), openness to new experiences, emotionality, conscientiousness (neg. corr.) and causality understanding (neg. corr.). We discuss the findings with reference to two hypothetical factors that drive individuals' acceptance of paranormal beliefs, inclination for story-telling, and tendency to evaluate belief content in terms of reason and conscientious evaluation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038PsychologyParanormal beliefsEsoterismPersonalityIndividual Differences |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tilmann Betsch Leonie Aßmann Andreas Glöckner |
spellingShingle |
Tilmann Betsch Leonie Aßmann Andreas Glöckner Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review Heliyon Psychology Paranormal beliefs Esoterism Personality Individual Differences |
author_facet |
Tilmann Betsch Leonie Aßmann Andreas Glöckner |
author_sort |
Tilmann Betsch |
title |
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
title_short |
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
title_full |
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
title_fullStr |
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
title_sort |
paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Heliyon |
issn |
2405-8440 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
In a sample of 599 participants (60% female, 18–81 years), we tested the hypotheses that cognitive ability and the big-six personality traits suffice to explain the individual-difference component of paranormal beliefs (belief in magic, astrology, esoterism, supernatural beings, and spirituality). Additionally, we measured 14 other potential predictors that were found to correlate with paranormal beliefs in prior research (e.g., ontological confusion). Although cognitive ability and the big-six explained 10% of the variance in individual belief, ontological confusion and causality understanding also were significant predictors in regression analyses. The resulting model, explaining 19 % of variance, consists of ontological confusion, cognitive ability (negative correlation), openness to new experiences, emotionality, conscientiousness (neg. corr.) and causality understanding (neg. corr.). We discuss the findings with reference to two hypothetical factors that drive individuals' acceptance of paranormal beliefs, inclination for story-telling, and tendency to evaluate belief content in terms of reason and conscientious evaluation. |
topic |
Psychology Paranormal beliefs Esoterism Personality Individual Differences |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020311038 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tilmannbetsch paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview AT leonieaßmann paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview AT andreasglockner paranormalbeliefsandindividualdifferencesstoryseekingwithoutreasonedreview |
_version_ |
1724615798095347712 |