Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)

Alfonso Castelao’s speech in defence of the Galician language, delivered during a 1931 parliamentary debate prior to the writing of a new constitution for Spain’s Second Republic, is a masterful piece of oratory which has recently been the subject of several academic analyses (cf. especially Monteag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lucas Martín Adur Nobile
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela 2012-01-01
Series:Estudos de Linguistica Galega
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305626425001
id doaj-399173f1045d45d9b8f370b344381b17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-399173f1045d45d9b8f370b344381b172020-11-24T21:40:20ZcatUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaEstudos de Linguistica Galega1889-25661989-578X2012-01-014512Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)Lucas Martín Adur NobileAlfonso Castelao’s speech in defence of the Galician language, delivered during a 1931 parliamentary debate prior to the writing of a new constitution for Spain’s Second Republic, is a masterful piece of oratory which has recently been the subject of several academic analyses (cf. especially Monteagudo 2000a, 2000b). The present paper applies discourse analysis to an examination of the oratorial ethos underpinning Castelao’s speech, viewing his constructed self-image (following Maingueneau 2002) as the product of interactions among a number of prediscourse elements (the speaker’s social role and institutional affiliation) and discourse-level features (lexis, syntax, direct and indirect references to the his own utterances). As the paper will show, and as Castelao himself indeed claimed, the ethos that emerges from Castelao’s speech is not that of a politician or a technician but rather the ethos of an artist. In consequence, the way in which his address is framed, i.e. the “scenography” presupposed by its utterance (Maingueneau 2005), diverges from what one would expect in a parliamentary debate in the direction of something fitting in more with the speaker’s projected self-image. Finally, another feature of Castelao’s discursive ethos is considered briefly, namely his status as representative of the Galician people.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305626425001
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lucas Martín Adur Nobile
spellingShingle Lucas Martín Adur Nobile
Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
Estudos de Linguistica Galega
author_facet Lucas Martín Adur Nobile
author_sort Lucas Martín Adur Nobile
title Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
title_short Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
title_full Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
title_fullStr Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
title_full_unstemmed Yo no soy más que un artista. El ethos discursivo de Castelao en su Defensa do idioma galego (1931)
title_sort yo no soy más que un artista. el ethos discursivo de castelao en su defensa do idioma galego (1931)
publisher Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
series Estudos de Linguistica Galega
issn 1889-2566
1989-578X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Alfonso Castelao’s speech in defence of the Galician language, delivered during a 1931 parliamentary debate prior to the writing of a new constitution for Spain’s Second Republic, is a masterful piece of oratory which has recently been the subject of several academic analyses (cf. especially Monteagudo 2000a, 2000b). The present paper applies discourse analysis to an examination of the oratorial ethos underpinning Castelao’s speech, viewing his constructed self-image (following Maingueneau 2002) as the product of interactions among a number of prediscourse elements (the speaker’s social role and institutional affiliation) and discourse-level features (lexis, syntax, direct and indirect references to the his own utterances). As the paper will show, and as Castelao himself indeed claimed, the ethos that emerges from Castelao’s speech is not that of a politician or a technician but rather the ethos of an artist. In consequence, the way in which his address is framed, i.e. the “scenography” presupposed by its utterance (Maingueneau 2005), diverges from what one would expect in a parliamentary debate in the direction of something fitting in more with the speaker’s projected self-image. Finally, another feature of Castelao’s discursive ethos is considered briefly, namely his status as representative of the Galician people.
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305626425001
work_keys_str_mv AT lucasmartinadurnobile yonosoymasqueunartistaelethosdiscursivodecastelaoensudefensadoidiomagalego1931
_version_ 1725926609357111296