Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions

Plant protection methods, even those considered as safe for the environment and consumers, may have unexpected effects on nontarget organisms. The effect of broad bean protection, using <i>Pythium oligandrum</i>, paraffin-coated garlic pulp, and extract from grapefruit seeds and pulp on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janina Gospodarek, Elżbieta Boligłowa, Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/2/211
id doaj-3990786af5184945a54865017773165b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3990786af5184945a54865017773165b2021-04-02T07:32:45ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952020-02-0110221110.3390/agronomy10020211agronomy10020211Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic ConditionsJanina Gospodarek0Elżbieta Boligłowa1Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk2Department of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Microbiology and Biomonitoring, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, PolandPlant protection methods, even those considered as safe for the environment and consumers, may have unexpected effects on nontarget organisms. The effect of broad bean protection, using <i>Pythium oligandrum</i>, paraffin-coated garlic pulp, and extract from grapefruit seeds and pulp on the abundance of epigeic and soil arthropodofauna in a 3-year field experiment was estimated. The effect was compared with chemical protection, which served as the reference to the conventional system. Use of nonchemical products did not affect the overall abundance of the studied arthropods such as Arachnida (except Acarina), Carabidae, Staphylinidae, and Collembola. These methods, however, may favor Formicidae. In comparison to chemicals (carboxin, mancozeb, deltamethrin, and alpha-cypermethrin), nonchemical preparations seemed to be safer for soil mites&#8212;they limited their abundance to a lesser degree. Some individual carabid species showed differing responses to the applied protection methods: <i>Amara aenea</i> occurred only in nonchemically protected areas, <i>Platynus assimilis</i> tends to prefer broad beans protected solely with <i>P. oligandrum</i>, while <i>Anchomenus dorsalis</i> prefer plots protected chemically (seed treatment and 3-time spraying). This may be the effect of the different shading of the soil surface as a result of the influence of protection measures on plant growth. Other explanations may include different vulnerability of species to preparations as well as indirect reaction to the occurrence of other taxa (reduced competition and impairment of food sources) or hormesis.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/2/211biological preparationsnontarget organismsorganic farmingbiopesticides
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janina Gospodarek
Elżbieta Boligłowa
Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk
spellingShingle Janina Gospodarek
Elżbieta Boligłowa
Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk
Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
Agronomy
biological preparations
nontarget organisms
organic farming
biopesticides
author_facet Janina Gospodarek
Elżbieta Boligłowa
Katarzyna Gleń-Karolczyk
author_sort Janina Gospodarek
title Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
title_short Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
title_full Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
title_fullStr Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Nonchemical Protection of Broad Bean on Epigeic and Soil Arthropodofauna—Analysis in Field-Realistic Conditions
title_sort impact of nonchemical protection of broad bean on epigeic and soil arthropodofauna—analysis in field-realistic conditions
publisher MDPI AG
series Agronomy
issn 2073-4395
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Plant protection methods, even those considered as safe for the environment and consumers, may have unexpected effects on nontarget organisms. The effect of broad bean protection, using <i>Pythium oligandrum</i>, paraffin-coated garlic pulp, and extract from grapefruit seeds and pulp on the abundance of epigeic and soil arthropodofauna in a 3-year field experiment was estimated. The effect was compared with chemical protection, which served as the reference to the conventional system. Use of nonchemical products did not affect the overall abundance of the studied arthropods such as Arachnida (except Acarina), Carabidae, Staphylinidae, and Collembola. These methods, however, may favor Formicidae. In comparison to chemicals (carboxin, mancozeb, deltamethrin, and alpha-cypermethrin), nonchemical preparations seemed to be safer for soil mites&#8212;they limited their abundance to a lesser degree. Some individual carabid species showed differing responses to the applied protection methods: <i>Amara aenea</i> occurred only in nonchemically protected areas, <i>Platynus assimilis</i> tends to prefer broad beans protected solely with <i>P. oligandrum</i>, while <i>Anchomenus dorsalis</i> prefer plots protected chemically (seed treatment and 3-time spraying). This may be the effect of the different shading of the soil surface as a result of the influence of protection measures on plant growth. Other explanations may include different vulnerability of species to preparations as well as indirect reaction to the occurrence of other taxa (reduced competition and impairment of food sources) or hormesis.
topic biological preparations
nontarget organisms
organic farming
biopesticides
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/2/211
work_keys_str_mv AT janinagospodarek impactofnonchemicalprotectionofbroadbeanonepigeicandsoilarthropodofaunaanalysisinfieldrealisticconditions
AT elzbietaboligłowa impactofnonchemicalprotectionofbroadbeanonepigeicandsoilarthropodofaunaanalysisinfieldrealisticconditions
AT katarzynaglenkarolczyk impactofnonchemicalprotectionofbroadbeanonepigeicandsoilarthropodofaunaanalysisinfieldrealisticconditions
_version_ 1724171095318200320