Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections
Despite the intense efforts to prevent programmers from writing code with memory errors, memory corruption vulnerabilities are still a major security threat. Consequently, control-flow integrity has received significant attention in the research community, and software developers to combat control c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/20/4229 |
id |
doaj-3988d3dd333747ca8fdd75289a7954d5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3988d3dd333747ca8fdd75289a7954d52020-11-25T01:47:21ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172019-10-01920422910.3390/app9204229app9204229Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and ProtectionsSarwar Sayeed0Hector Marco-Gisbert1Ismael Ripoll2Miriam Birch3School of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, UKSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, UKDepartment of Computing Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, SpainSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, UKDespite the intense efforts to prevent programmers from writing code with memory errors, memory corruption vulnerabilities are still a major security threat. Consequently, control-flow integrity has received significant attention in the research community, and software developers to combat control code execution attacks in the presence of type of faults. Control-flow Integrity (CFI) is a large family of techniques that aims to eradicate memory error exploitation by ensuring that the instruction pointer (IP) of a running process cannot be controlled by a malicious attacker. In this paper, we assess the effectiveness of 14 CFI techniques against the most popular exploitation techniques, including code reuse attacks, return-to-user, return-to-libc, and replay attacks. We also classify these techniques based on their security, robustness, and implementation complexity. Our study indicates that the majority of the CFI techniques are primarily focused on restricting indirect branch instructions and cannot prevent all forms of vulnerability exploitation. We conclude that the performance overhead introduced, jointly with the partial attack coverage, is discouraging the industry from adopting most of them.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/20/4229cfi protectionscfi attacksmemory errorssecurityexploitation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sarwar Sayeed Hector Marco-Gisbert Ismael Ripoll Miriam Birch |
spellingShingle |
Sarwar Sayeed Hector Marco-Gisbert Ismael Ripoll Miriam Birch Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections Applied Sciences cfi protections cfi attacks memory errors security exploitation |
author_facet |
Sarwar Sayeed Hector Marco-Gisbert Ismael Ripoll Miriam Birch |
author_sort |
Sarwar Sayeed |
title |
Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections |
title_short |
Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections |
title_full |
Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections |
title_fullStr |
Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Control-Flow Integrity: Attacks and Protections |
title_sort |
control-flow integrity: attacks and protections |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Despite the intense efforts to prevent programmers from writing code with memory errors, memory corruption vulnerabilities are still a major security threat. Consequently, control-flow integrity has received significant attention in the research community, and software developers to combat control code execution attacks in the presence of type of faults. Control-flow Integrity (CFI) is a large family of techniques that aims to eradicate memory error exploitation by ensuring that the instruction pointer (IP) of a running process cannot be controlled by a malicious attacker. In this paper, we assess the effectiveness of 14 CFI techniques against the most popular exploitation techniques, including code reuse attacks, return-to-user, return-to-libc, and replay attacks. We also classify these techniques based on their security, robustness, and implementation complexity. Our study indicates that the majority of the CFI techniques are primarily focused on restricting indirect branch instructions and cannot prevent all forms of vulnerability exploitation. We conclude that the performance overhead introduced, jointly with the partial attack coverage, is discouraging the industry from adopting most of them. |
topic |
cfi protections cfi attacks memory errors security exploitation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/9/20/4229 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarwarsayeed controlflowintegrityattacksandprotections AT hectormarcogisbert controlflowintegrityattacksandprotections AT ismaelripoll controlflowintegrityattacksandprotections AT miriambirch controlflowintegrityattacksandprotections |
_version_ |
1725014802143641600 |