Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)

The investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khvesyk Michael A., Shubalyi Alexander M., Golyan Vasily A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-09-01
Series:Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022
id doaj-3960fed5207b4bd6af9f1064ccecc4c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3960fed5207b4bd6af9f1064ccecc4c42021-09-05T20:44:59ZengSciendoFolia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry0071-66772199-59072017-09-0159320721810.1515/ffp-2017-0022ffp-2017-0022Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)Khvesyk Michael A.0Shubalyi Alexander M.1Golyan Vasily A.2The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, blvd. T. Shevchenka 60, Kyiv, UkraineLutsk National Technical University, Department of Applied Statistics and Labour Economics, Lvivska 75, Lutsk, Volynska oblast, 43018Ukraine, phone: +380 675977616The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, blvd. T. Shevchenka 60, Kyiv, UkraineThe investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration, profitability of logging, forestry financial return, forestry protection and security level, and legislation observance. Three main indices were selected to ensure evaluation proportionality. The individual indices of each indicator by regions are calculated and the group integral indices by each criterion along with the reconciled integral index by all groups of criteria are defined. Application of this methodology by the example of Ukrainian forestry allowed conducting ranking and grouping of regions by indicators of integral indices for certain years and the period of 2011−2013. The diagrammed map is plotted to demonstrate the results visually. It revealed that certain highly forested regions did not ensure appropriate forestry development level as individual steppe zone regions. Elaborated methodology can be used for analogical evaluation of forestry development for other countries and their regions or for a set of countries in a certain territory.https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022evaluation criteriaforest resourcesforest zonesmetricsgroup and integral indicesregional grouping
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khvesyk Michael A.
Shubalyi Alexander M.
Golyan Vasily A.
spellingShingle Khvesyk Michael A.
Shubalyi Alexander M.
Golyan Vasily A.
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry
evaluation criteria
forest resources
forest zones
metrics
group and integral indices
regional grouping
author_facet Khvesyk Michael A.
Shubalyi Alexander M.
Golyan Vasily A.
author_sort Khvesyk Michael A.
title Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
title_short Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
title_full Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
title_fullStr Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
title_full_unstemmed Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
title_sort multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of ukraine)
publisher Sciendo
series Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry
issn 0071-6677
2199-5907
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration, profitability of logging, forestry financial return, forestry protection and security level, and legislation observance. Three main indices were selected to ensure evaluation proportionality. The individual indices of each indicator by regions are calculated and the group integral indices by each criterion along with the reconciled integral index by all groups of criteria are defined. Application of this methodology by the example of Ukrainian forestry allowed conducting ranking and grouping of regions by indicators of integral indices for certain years and the period of 2011−2013. The diagrammed map is plotted to demonstrate the results visually. It revealed that certain highly forested regions did not ensure appropriate forestry development level as individual steppe zone regions. Elaborated methodology can be used for analogical evaluation of forestry development for other countries and their regions or for a set of countries in a certain territory.
topic evaluation criteria
forest resources
forest zones
metrics
group and integral indices
regional grouping
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022
work_keys_str_mv AT khvesykmichaela multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine
AT shubalyialexanderm multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine
AT golyanvasilya multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine
_version_ 1717784728431493120