Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)
The investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022 |
id |
doaj-3960fed5207b4bd6af9f1064ccecc4c4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3960fed5207b4bd6af9f1064ccecc4c42021-09-05T20:44:59ZengSciendoFolia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry0071-66772199-59072017-09-0159320721810.1515/ffp-2017-0022ffp-2017-0022Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine)Khvesyk Michael A.0Shubalyi Alexander M.1Golyan Vasily A.2The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, blvd. T. Shevchenka 60, Kyiv, UkraineLutsk National Technical University, Department of Applied Statistics and Labour Economics, Lvivska 75, Lutsk, Volynska oblast, 43018Ukraine, phone: +380 675977616The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, blvd. T. Shevchenka 60, Kyiv, UkraineThe investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration, profitability of logging, forestry financial return, forestry protection and security level, and legislation observance. Three main indices were selected to ensure evaluation proportionality. The individual indices of each indicator by regions are calculated and the group integral indices by each criterion along with the reconciled integral index by all groups of criteria are defined. Application of this methodology by the example of Ukrainian forestry allowed conducting ranking and grouping of regions by indicators of integral indices for certain years and the period of 2011−2013. The diagrammed map is plotted to demonstrate the results visually. It revealed that certain highly forested regions did not ensure appropriate forestry development level as individual steppe zone regions. Elaborated methodology can be used for analogical evaluation of forestry development for other countries and their regions or for a set of countries in a certain territory.https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022evaluation criteriaforest resourcesforest zonesmetricsgroup and integral indicesregional grouping |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Khvesyk Michael A. Shubalyi Alexander M. Golyan Vasily A. |
spellingShingle |
Khvesyk Michael A. Shubalyi Alexander M. Golyan Vasily A. Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry evaluation criteria forest resources forest zones metrics group and integral indices regional grouping |
author_facet |
Khvesyk Michael A. Shubalyi Alexander M. Golyan Vasily A. |
author_sort |
Khvesyk Michael A. |
title |
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) |
title_short |
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) |
title_full |
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) |
title_fullStr |
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of Ukraine) |
title_sort |
multicriteria evaluation of forestry development by regions (by the example of ukraine) |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Folia Forestalia Polonica: Series A - Forestry |
issn |
0071-6677 2199-5907 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
The investigation aims at elaboration and practical application of multicriteria evaluation methodology to compare the forestry development levels in the context of regions based on index method. Elaborated methodology provides 5 assessment criteria: intensity of forest reproduction and regeneration, profitability of logging, forestry financial return, forestry protection and security level, and legislation observance. Three main indices were selected to ensure evaluation proportionality. The individual indices of each indicator by regions are calculated and the group integral indices by each criterion along with the reconciled integral index by all groups of criteria are defined. Application of this methodology by the example of Ukrainian forestry allowed conducting ranking and grouping of regions by indicators of integral indices for certain years and the period of 2011−2013. The diagrammed map is plotted to demonstrate the results visually. It revealed that certain highly forested regions did not ensure appropriate forestry development level as individual steppe zone regions. Elaborated methodology can be used for analogical evaluation of forestry development for other countries and their regions or for a set of countries in a certain territory. |
topic |
evaluation criteria forest resources forest zones metrics group and integral indices regional grouping |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0022 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT khvesykmichaela multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine AT shubalyialexanderm multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine AT golyanvasilya multicriteriaevaluationofforestrydevelopmentbyregionsbytheexampleofukraine |
_version_ |
1717784728431493120 |