CO2 insufflation versus air insufflation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation is increasingly used for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) owing to the faster absorption of CO2 as compared to that of air. Studies comparing CO2 insufflation and air insufflation have reported conflicting results.This meta-analysis is aimed to assess the effi...
Main Authors: | Xuan Li, Hao Dong, Yifeng Zhang, Guoxin Zhang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5443502?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by: Ramkaji Baniya, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Is It an Urgent Need?
by: Chang Seok Bang, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Carbon dioxide insufflation is superior to air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized trial
by: Santosh Darisetty, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Marina Lordello Passos, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Water exchange versus air insufflation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis
by: Yang Liu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)