CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma

Background: The distinction between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) may be very difficult in some cases because of the close similarities of these two lesions clinically and histopathologically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of CD10 in distinguishin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitra Heidarpour, Parvin Rajabi, Farzaneh Sajadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=7;spage=938;epage=944;aulast=Heidarpour
id doaj-39486b2b072046c18693e47aeb8a7c5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39486b2b072046c18693e47aeb8a7c5b2020-11-24T22:23:18ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362011-01-01167938944CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepitheliomaMitra HeidarpourParvin RajabiFarzaneh SajadiBackground: The distinction between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) may be very difficult in some cases because of the close similarities of these two lesions clinically and histopathologically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of CD10 in distinguishing BCC and TE. Methods: The immunohistochemical expression of CD10 was evaluated in an archived group of 30 BCCs and 12 TEs in a retrospective cross sectional study. The localization of anti-CD10 to the tumoral and/or stromal cells was determined in each case and was compared between these two tumors using Fisher′s Exact Test. Results: In BCC cases, the expression of CD10 was noted in tumoral cells in 26 cases (83.2%). Of these, 3 cases showed positivity of the stromal and basaloid cells, two cases demonstrated stromal expression alone and two BCCs were not immunoreactive. On the other hand, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) TEs showed positive stromal immunoreactivity. Of these, one case also showed positivity of the basaloid cells. One TE demonstrated epithelial expression alone and one TE was not immunoreactive. The pattern of staining of basaloid cells and stromal cells in BCC and trichoepithelioma was statistically different (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that CD10 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of BCC versus TE.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=7;spage=938;epage=944;aulast=HeidarpourBasal Cell CarcinomaTrichoepitheliomaCD10
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mitra Heidarpour
Parvin Rajabi
Farzaneh Sajadi
spellingShingle Mitra Heidarpour
Parvin Rajabi
Farzaneh Sajadi
CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Trichoepithelioma
CD10
author_facet Mitra Heidarpour
Parvin Rajabi
Farzaneh Sajadi
author_sort Mitra Heidarpour
title CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
title_short CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
title_full CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
title_fullStr CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
title_full_unstemmed CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
title_sort cd10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background: The distinction between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) may be very difficult in some cases because of the close similarities of these two lesions clinically and histopathologically. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of CD10 in distinguishing BCC and TE. Methods: The immunohistochemical expression of CD10 was evaluated in an archived group of 30 BCCs and 12 TEs in a retrospective cross sectional study. The localization of anti-CD10 to the tumoral and/or stromal cells was determined in each case and was compared between these two tumors using Fisher′s Exact Test. Results: In BCC cases, the expression of CD10 was noted in tumoral cells in 26 cases (83.2%). Of these, 3 cases showed positivity of the stromal and basaloid cells, two cases demonstrated stromal expression alone and two BCCs were not immunoreactive. On the other hand, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) TEs showed positive stromal immunoreactivity. Of these, one case also showed positivity of the basaloid cells. One TE demonstrated epithelial expression alone and one TE was not immunoreactive. The pattern of staining of basaloid cells and stromal cells in BCC and trichoepithelioma was statistically different (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that CD10 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of BCC versus TE.
topic Basal Cell Carcinoma
Trichoepithelioma
CD10
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2011;volume=16;issue=7;spage=938;epage=944;aulast=Heidarpour
work_keys_str_mv AT mitraheidarpour cd10expressionhelpstodifferentiatebasalcellcarcinomafromtrichoepithelioma
AT parvinrajabi cd10expressionhelpstodifferentiatebasalcellcarcinomafromtrichoepithelioma
AT farzanehsajadi cd10expressionhelpstodifferentiatebasalcellcarcinomafromtrichoepithelioma
_version_ 1725764988853813248