Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up

Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex S. Hartlage, Amit Kapoor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596
id doaj-3946c3dfa31d42e694b96a042dc53805
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3946c3dfa31d42e694b96a042dc538052021-08-26T14:27:01ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-08-01131596159610.3390/v13081596Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut UpAlex S. Hartlage0Amit Kapoor1Center for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USACenter for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USAUnless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection. This review discusses our current understanding of HCV immunity and the critical gaps that should be filled before embarking upon new HCV vaccine trials. We discuss the importance of T cells, neutralizing antibodies, and HCV genetic diversity. We address if and how the animal HCV-like viruses can be used for conceptualizing effective HCV vaccines and what we have learned so far from these HCV surrogates. Finally, we propose a logical but narrow path forward for HCV vaccine development.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596hepatitis C virus<i>Hepacivirus</i>vaccineanimal modelcontrolled human infection model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alex S. Hartlage
Amit Kapoor
spellingShingle Alex S. Hartlage
Amit Kapoor
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
Viruses
hepatitis C virus
<i>Hepacivirus</i>
vaccine
animal model
controlled human infection model
author_facet Alex S. Hartlage
Amit Kapoor
author_sort Alex S. Hartlage
title Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
title_short Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
title_full Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
title_fullStr Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
title_sort hepatitis c virus vaccine research: time to put up or shut up
publisher MDPI AG
series Viruses
issn 1999-4915
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection. This review discusses our current understanding of HCV immunity and the critical gaps that should be filled before embarking upon new HCV vaccine trials. We discuss the importance of T cells, neutralizing antibodies, and HCV genetic diversity. We address if and how the animal HCV-like viruses can be used for conceptualizing effective HCV vaccines and what we have learned so far from these HCV surrogates. Finally, we propose a logical but narrow path forward for HCV vaccine development.
topic hepatitis C virus
<i>Hepacivirus</i>
vaccine
animal model
controlled human infection model
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596
work_keys_str_mv AT alexshartlage hepatitiscvirusvaccineresearchtimetoputuporshutup
AT amitkapoor hepatitiscvirusvaccineresearchtimetoputuporshutup
_version_ 1721189346820751360