Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up
Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Viruses |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596 |
id |
doaj-3946c3dfa31d42e694b96a042dc53805 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3946c3dfa31d42e694b96a042dc538052021-08-26T14:27:01ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-08-01131596159610.3390/v13081596Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut UpAlex S. Hartlage0Amit Kapoor1Center for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USACenter for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USAUnless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection. This review discusses our current understanding of HCV immunity and the critical gaps that should be filled before embarking upon new HCV vaccine trials. We discuss the importance of T cells, neutralizing antibodies, and HCV genetic diversity. We address if and how the animal HCV-like viruses can be used for conceptualizing effective HCV vaccines and what we have learned so far from these HCV surrogates. Finally, we propose a logical but narrow path forward for HCV vaccine development.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596hepatitis C virus<i>Hepacivirus</i>vaccineanimal modelcontrolled human infection model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alex S. Hartlage Amit Kapoor |
spellingShingle |
Alex S. Hartlage Amit Kapoor Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up Viruses hepatitis C virus <i>Hepacivirus</i> vaccine animal model controlled human infection model |
author_facet |
Alex S. Hartlage Amit Kapoor |
author_sort |
Alex S. Hartlage |
title |
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up |
title_short |
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up |
title_full |
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up |
title_fullStr |
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up |
title_sort |
hepatitis c virus vaccine research: time to put up or shut up |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Viruses |
issn |
1999-4915 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in-depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection. This review discusses our current understanding of HCV immunity and the critical gaps that should be filled before embarking upon new HCV vaccine trials. We discuss the importance of T cells, neutralizing antibodies, and HCV genetic diversity. We address if and how the animal HCV-like viruses can be used for conceptualizing effective HCV vaccines and what we have learned so far from these HCV surrogates. Finally, we propose a logical but narrow path forward for HCV vaccine development. |
topic |
hepatitis C virus <i>Hepacivirus</i> vaccine animal model controlled human infection model |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/8/1596 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexshartlage hepatitiscvirusvaccineresearchtimetoputuporshutup AT amitkapoor hepatitiscvirusvaccineresearchtimetoputuporshutup |
_version_ |
1721189346820751360 |