Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology

Continental philosophers of religion and the theologians who engage with them have recently began to blur the lines between the disciplines of philosophy and theology. This is particularly true after the so-called “theological turn” in phenomenology. I argue for an appreciation of their approaches b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Justin Sands
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-06-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/7/83
id doaj-393f44b6100c4bda92027d3c5039321d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-393f44b6100c4bda92027d3c5039321d2020-11-25T01:29:28ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-06-01778310.3390/rel7070083rel7070083Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and TheologyJustin Sands0School of Philosophy, North-West University Potchefstroom, Potchefstroom 2790, South AfricaContinental philosophers of religion and the theologians who engage with them have recently began to blur the lines between the disciplines of philosophy and theology. This is particularly true after the so-called “theological turn” in phenomenology. I argue for an appreciation of their approaches but will also express that these explorations must remain interdisciplinary. Far too often philosophers and theologians alike appropriate freely within their interdisciplinary research with little regard for the presuppositions and methodologies latent within their appropriations. This article will demonstrate these appropriations through an exploration of Merold Westphal and Richard Kearney’s use of hermeneutical phenomenology, and will claim that their use of this methodology falls upon two distinct discourses, a theological one for Westphal and a philosophical one for Kearney. The upshot of this exploration is an argument for a renewal of methodological restraint when appropriating from other disciplines and a respect for the difference between academic disciplines.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/7/83Richard KearneyMerold WestphalPaul Ricoeurfundamental theologyphilosophy of religioninterdisciplinary research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Sands
spellingShingle Justin Sands
Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
Religions
Richard Kearney
Merold Westphal
Paul Ricoeur
fundamental theology
philosophy of religion
interdisciplinary research
author_facet Justin Sands
author_sort Justin Sands
title Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
title_short Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
title_full Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
title_fullStr Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
title_full_unstemmed Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
title_sort passing through customs: merold westphal, richard kearney, and the methodological boundaries between philosophy of religion and theology
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2016-06-01
description Continental philosophers of religion and the theologians who engage with them have recently began to blur the lines between the disciplines of philosophy and theology. This is particularly true after the so-called “theological turn” in phenomenology. I argue for an appreciation of their approaches but will also express that these explorations must remain interdisciplinary. Far too often philosophers and theologians alike appropriate freely within their interdisciplinary research with little regard for the presuppositions and methodologies latent within their appropriations. This article will demonstrate these appropriations through an exploration of Merold Westphal and Richard Kearney’s use of hermeneutical phenomenology, and will claim that their use of this methodology falls upon two distinct discourses, a theological one for Westphal and a philosophical one for Kearney. The upshot of this exploration is an argument for a renewal of methodological restraint when appropriating from other disciplines and a respect for the difference between academic disciplines.
topic Richard Kearney
Merold Westphal
Paul Ricoeur
fundamental theology
philosophy of religion
interdisciplinary research
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/7/83
work_keys_str_mv AT justinsands passingthroughcustomsmeroldwestphalrichardkearneyandthemethodologicalboundariesbetweenphilosophyofreligionandtheology
_version_ 1725096953129205760