The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) taper...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Arthroplasty Today |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346 |
id |
doaj-3926b8caaf414814a2d235f8630ce188 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3926b8caaf414814a2d235f8630ce1882020-11-24T21:48:05ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412017-06-013211912410.1016/j.artd.2016.08.005The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stabilityNicholas B. Frisch, MDJonathan R. Lynch, MDRichard F. Banglmaier, PhDCraig D. Silverton, DOBackground: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively. Results: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N). Conclusions: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346Total hip arthroplastyModularityCorrosionStability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicholas B. Frisch, MD Jonathan R. Lynch, MD Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD Craig D. Silverton, DO |
spellingShingle |
Nicholas B. Frisch, MD Jonathan R. Lynch, MD Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD Craig D. Silverton, DO The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability Arthroplasty Today Total hip arthroplasty Modularity Corrosion Stability |
author_facet |
Nicholas B. Frisch, MD Jonathan R. Lynch, MD Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD Craig D. Silverton, DO |
author_sort |
Nicholas B. Frisch, MD |
title |
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
title_short |
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
title_full |
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
title_fullStr |
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
title_full_unstemmed |
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
title_sort |
stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Arthroplasty Today |
issn |
2352-3441 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components.
Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively.
Results: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N).
Conclusions: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure. |
topic |
Total hip arthroplasty Modularity Corrosion Stability |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholasbfrischmd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT jonathanrlynchmd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT richardfbanglmaierphd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT craigdsilvertondo thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT nicholasbfrischmd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT jonathanrlynchmd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT richardfbanglmaierphd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability AT craigdsilvertondo stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability |
_version_ |
1725893523318767616 |