The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) taper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas B. Frisch, MD, Jonathan R. Lynch, MD, Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD, Craig D. Silverton, DO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-06-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346
id doaj-3926b8caaf414814a2d235f8630ce188
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3926b8caaf414814a2d235f8630ce1882020-11-24T21:48:05ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412017-06-013211912410.1016/j.artd.2016.08.005The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stabilityNicholas B. Frisch, MDJonathan R. Lynch, MDRichard F. Banglmaier, PhDCraig D. Silverton, DOBackground: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively. Results: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N). Conclusions: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346Total hip arthroplastyModularityCorrosionStability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicholas B. Frisch, MD
Jonathan R. Lynch, MD
Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD
Craig D. Silverton, DO
spellingShingle Nicholas B. Frisch, MD
Jonathan R. Lynch, MD
Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD
Craig D. Silverton, DO
The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
Arthroplasty Today
Total hip arthroplasty
Modularity
Corrosion
Stability
author_facet Nicholas B. Frisch, MD
Jonathan R. Lynch, MD
Richard F. Banglmaier, PhD
Craig D. Silverton, DO
author_sort Nicholas B. Frisch, MD
title The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
title_short The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
title_full The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
title_fullStr The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
title_full_unstemmed The stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
title_sort stability of dual-taper modular hip implants: a biomechanical analysis examining the effect of impact location on component stability
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stability of dual-taper modular implants following impaction forces delivered at varying locations as measured by the distraction forces required to disassemble the components. Methods: Distraction of the head-neck and neck-stem (NS) tapers of dual-taper modular implants with 0°, 8°, and 15° neck angles were measured utilizing a custom-made distraction fixture attached to a servohydraulic materials test machine. Distraction was measured after hand pressing the components as well as following a simulated firm hammer blow impaction. Impacts to the 0°, 8°, 15° necks were directed axially in line with the neck, 10° anterior, and 10° proximal to the axis of the neck, respectively. Results: Impaction increased the range of NS component distraction forces when compared to hand pressed components (1125-1743 N vs 248-302 N, respectively). Off-axis impacts resulted in significantly reduced mean (±95% confidence interval) distraction forces (8° neck, 1125 ± 117 N; 15° neck, 1212 ± 73 N), which were up to 35% lower than the mean distraction force for axial impacts to the 0° neck (1743 ± 138 N). Conclusions: Direction of impaction influences stability of the modular interface. The greatest stability was achieved with impaction directed in line with the longitudinal axis of the taper junction. Off-axis impaction of the 8° and 15° neck led to significantly reduced stability at the NS. Improving stability of dual-taper modular hip prostheses with appropriately directed impaction may help to minimize micromotion, component settling, fretting corrosion, and subsequent failure.
topic Total hip arthroplasty
Modularity
Corrosion
Stability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344116300346
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasbfrischmd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT jonathanrlynchmd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT richardfbanglmaierphd thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT craigdsilvertondo thestabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT nicholasbfrischmd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT jonathanrlynchmd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT richardfbanglmaierphd stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
AT craigdsilvertondo stabilityofdualtapermodularhipimplantsabiomechanicalanalysisexaminingtheeffectofimpactlocationoncomponentstability
_version_ 1725893523318767616