Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Arch length preservation strategies utilize leeway space or E-space in the mixed dentition to resolve mild to moderate mandibular incisor crowding. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to analyze the effects of arch length preservation strategies in on mand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sivakumar Arunachalam, Indumathi Sivakumar, Jayakumar Jayaraman, Jitendra Sharan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01755-1
id doaj-391e6da1bb6e47399f8d483d37f11c40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-391e6da1bb6e47399f8d483d37f11c402021-08-15T11:37:15ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312021-08-0121111310.1186/s12903-021-01755-1Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysisSivakumar Arunachalam0Indumathi Sivakumar1Jayakumar Jayaraman2Jitendra Sharan3School of Dentistry, International Medical UniversityFaculty of Dentistry, SEGi UniversityDepartment of Developmental Dentistry, University of Texas Health School of DentistryDepartment of Dentistry, AIIMSAbstract Background Arch length preservation strategies utilize leeway space or E-space in the mixed dentition to resolve mild to moderate mandibular incisor crowding. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to analyze the effects of arch length preservation strategies in on mandibular second permanent molar eruption. Methods A search for relevant articles published from inception until May 2020 was performed using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane databases, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google scholar and journal databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adopted for the conduct of the systematic review. Using RevMan 5.3 software, the most pertinent data were extracted and pooled for quantitative analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was analyzed by using Cochran Q test and I squared statistics. Results A total of 5 studies involving 855 mixed dentition patients with arch length preservation therapy were included in the qualitative analysis. Pooled estimate of the data from two studies revealed 3.14 times higher odds of developing mandibular second molar eruption difficulty due to arch length preservation strategies using lingual holding arch (95% CI; OR 1.10–8.92). There was no heterogeneity found in the analysis. The certainty levels were graded as very low. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates that arch length preservation strategies pose a risk for development of mandibular second molar eruption disturbances, but the evidence was of very low quality. Registration number: CRD42019116643.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01755-1Leeway spaceE- spaceArch lengthLip bumperLingual holding archMolar impaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sivakumar Arunachalam
Indumathi Sivakumar
Jayakumar Jayaraman
Jitendra Sharan
spellingShingle Sivakumar Arunachalam
Indumathi Sivakumar
Jayakumar Jayaraman
Jitendra Sharan
Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Oral Health
Leeway space
E- space
Arch length
Lip bumper
Lingual holding arch
Molar impaction
author_facet Sivakumar Arunachalam
Indumathi Sivakumar
Jayakumar Jayaraman
Jitendra Sharan
author_sort Sivakumar Arunachalam
title Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort does arch length preservation in mixed dentition children affect mandibular second permanent molar eruption? a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background Arch length preservation strategies utilize leeway space or E-space in the mixed dentition to resolve mild to moderate mandibular incisor crowding. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature was to analyze the effects of arch length preservation strategies in on mandibular second permanent molar eruption. Methods A search for relevant articles published from inception until May 2020 was performed using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane databases, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google scholar and journal databases. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adopted for the conduct of the systematic review. Using RevMan 5.3 software, the most pertinent data were extracted and pooled for quantitative analysis with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was analyzed by using Cochran Q test and I squared statistics. Results A total of 5 studies involving 855 mixed dentition patients with arch length preservation therapy were included in the qualitative analysis. Pooled estimate of the data from two studies revealed 3.14 times higher odds of developing mandibular second molar eruption difficulty due to arch length preservation strategies using lingual holding arch (95% CI; OR 1.10–8.92). There was no heterogeneity found in the analysis. The certainty levels were graded as very low. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrates that arch length preservation strategies pose a risk for development of mandibular second molar eruption disturbances, but the evidence was of very low quality. Registration number: CRD42019116643.
topic Leeway space
E- space
Arch length
Lip bumper
Lingual holding arch
Molar impaction
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01755-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sivakumararunachalam doesarchlengthpreservationinmixeddentitionchildrenaffectmandibularsecondpermanentmolareruptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT indumathisivakumar doesarchlengthpreservationinmixeddentitionchildrenaffectmandibularsecondpermanentmolareruptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jayakumarjayaraman doesarchlengthpreservationinmixeddentitionchildrenaffectmandibularsecondpermanentmolareruptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jitendrasharan doesarchlengthpreservationinmixeddentitionchildrenaffectmandibularsecondpermanentmolareruptionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721206619430191104