Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.

This study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melanie B Lengowski, Karin H R Zuber, Maren Witzig, Jens Möhring, Jeannette Boguhn, Markus Rodehutscord
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render
id doaj-391e220802c94ed3b663b0634a5bd1d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-391e220802c94ed3b663b0634a5bd1d22020-11-25T02:00:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e015011510.1371/journal.pone.0150115Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.Melanie B LengowskiKarin H R ZuberMaren WitzigJens MöhringJeannette BoguhnMarkus RodehutscordThis study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residues at 0, 24, and 48 h after initiation of incubation (period 1) and on day 13 (period 2). Microbial DNA was extracted and real-time qPCR was used to quantify differences in the abundance of protozoa, methanogens, total bacteria, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminobacter amylophilus, Prevotella bryantii, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Clostridium aminophilum. We found that forage source and sampling time significantly influenced the ruminal microbial community. The gene copy numbers of most microbial species (except C. aminophilum) decreased in period 1; however, adaption continued through period 2 for several species. The addition of fresh substrate in period 2 led to increasing copy numbers of all microbial species during the first 2-4 h in the fermenter liquid except protozoa, which showed a postprandial decrease. Corn silage enhanced the growth of R. amylophilus and F. succinogenes, and grass silage enhanced R. albus, P. bryantii, and C. aminophilum. No effect of forage source was detected on total bacteria, protozoa, S. ruminantium, or methanogens or on total gas production, although grass silage enhanced methane production. This study showed that the Rusitec provides a stable system after an adaption phase that should last longer than 48 h, and that the forage source influenced several microbial species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melanie B Lengowski
Karin H R Zuber
Maren Witzig
Jens Möhring
Jeannette Boguhn
Markus Rodehutscord
spellingShingle Melanie B Lengowski
Karin H R Zuber
Maren Witzig
Jens Möhring
Jeannette Boguhn
Markus Rodehutscord
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Melanie B Lengowski
Karin H R Zuber
Maren Witzig
Jens Möhring
Jeannette Boguhn
Markus Rodehutscord
author_sort Melanie B Lengowski
title Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
title_short Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
title_full Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
title_fullStr Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
title_sort changes in rumen microbial community composition during adaption to an in vitro system and the impact of different forages.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residues at 0, 24, and 48 h after initiation of incubation (period 1) and on day 13 (period 2). Microbial DNA was extracted and real-time qPCR was used to quantify differences in the abundance of protozoa, methanogens, total bacteria, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminobacter amylophilus, Prevotella bryantii, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Clostridium aminophilum. We found that forage source and sampling time significantly influenced the ruminal microbial community. The gene copy numbers of most microbial species (except C. aminophilum) decreased in period 1; however, adaption continued through period 2 for several species. The addition of fresh substrate in period 2 led to increasing copy numbers of all microbial species during the first 2-4 h in the fermenter liquid except protozoa, which showed a postprandial decrease. Corn silage enhanced the growth of R. amylophilus and F. succinogenes, and grass silage enhanced R. albus, P. bryantii, and C. aminophilum. No effect of forage source was detected on total bacteria, protozoa, S. ruminantium, or methanogens or on total gas production, although grass silage enhanced methane production. This study showed that the Rusitec provides a stable system after an adaption phase that should last longer than 48 h, and that the forage source influenced several microbial species.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT melanieblengowski changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
AT karinhrzuber changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
AT marenwitzig changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
AT jensmohring changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
AT jeannetteboguhn changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
AT markusrodehutscord changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages
_version_ 1724960915630063616