Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.
This study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-391e220802c94ed3b663b0634a5bd1d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-391e220802c94ed3b663b0634a5bd1d22020-11-25T02:00:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e015011510.1371/journal.pone.0150115Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages.Melanie B LengowskiKarin H R ZuberMaren WitzigJens MöhringJeannette BoguhnMarkus RodehutscordThis study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residues at 0, 24, and 48 h after initiation of incubation (period 1) and on day 13 (period 2). Microbial DNA was extracted and real-time qPCR was used to quantify differences in the abundance of protozoa, methanogens, total bacteria, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminobacter amylophilus, Prevotella bryantii, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Clostridium aminophilum. We found that forage source and sampling time significantly influenced the ruminal microbial community. The gene copy numbers of most microbial species (except C. aminophilum) decreased in period 1; however, adaption continued through period 2 for several species. The addition of fresh substrate in period 2 led to increasing copy numbers of all microbial species during the first 2-4 h in the fermenter liquid except protozoa, which showed a postprandial decrease. Corn silage enhanced the growth of R. amylophilus and F. succinogenes, and grass silage enhanced R. albus, P. bryantii, and C. aminophilum. No effect of forage source was detected on total bacteria, protozoa, S. ruminantium, or methanogens or on total gas production, although grass silage enhanced methane production. This study showed that the Rusitec provides a stable system after an adaption phase that should last longer than 48 h, and that the forage source influenced several microbial species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Melanie B Lengowski Karin H R Zuber Maren Witzig Jens Möhring Jeannette Boguhn Markus Rodehutscord |
spellingShingle |
Melanie B Lengowski Karin H R Zuber Maren Witzig Jens Möhring Jeannette Boguhn Markus Rodehutscord Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Melanie B Lengowski Karin H R Zuber Maren Witzig Jens Möhring Jeannette Boguhn Markus Rodehutscord |
author_sort |
Melanie B Lengowski |
title |
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. |
title_short |
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. |
title_full |
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. |
title_fullStr |
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Changes in Rumen Microbial Community Composition during Adaption to an In Vitro System and the Impact of Different Forages. |
title_sort |
changes in rumen microbial community composition during adaption to an in vitro system and the impact of different forages. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
This study examined ruminal microbial community composition alterations during initial adaption to and following incubation in a rumen simulation system (Rusitec) using grass or corn silage as substrates. Samples were collected from fermenter liquids at 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48 h and from feed residues at 0, 24, and 48 h after initiation of incubation (period 1) and on day 13 (period 2). Microbial DNA was extracted and real-time qPCR was used to quantify differences in the abundance of protozoa, methanogens, total bacteria, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminobacter amylophilus, Prevotella bryantii, Selenomonas ruminantium, and Clostridium aminophilum. We found that forage source and sampling time significantly influenced the ruminal microbial community. The gene copy numbers of most microbial species (except C. aminophilum) decreased in period 1; however, adaption continued through period 2 for several species. The addition of fresh substrate in period 2 led to increasing copy numbers of all microbial species during the first 2-4 h in the fermenter liquid except protozoa, which showed a postprandial decrease. Corn silage enhanced the growth of R. amylophilus and F. succinogenes, and grass silage enhanced R. albus, P. bryantii, and C. aminophilum. No effect of forage source was detected on total bacteria, protozoa, S. ruminantium, or methanogens or on total gas production, although grass silage enhanced methane production. This study showed that the Rusitec provides a stable system after an adaption phase that should last longer than 48 h, and that the forage source influenced several microbial species. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4771158?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melanieblengowski changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages AT karinhrzuber changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages AT marenwitzig changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages AT jensmohring changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages AT jeannetteboguhn changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages AT markusrodehutscord changesinrumenmicrobialcommunitycompositionduringadaptiontoaninvitrosystemandtheimpactofdifferentforages |
_version_ |
1724960915630063616 |