What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?

Radionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and subcellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumour cells...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darren eBrady, Joe M O'Sullivan, Kevin M Prise
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215/full
id doaj-39149627c8b549afb2f608f92987732f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39149627c8b549afb2f608f92987732f2020-11-25T01:57:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2013-08-01310.3389/fonc.2013.0021554385What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?Darren eBrady0Joe M O'Sullivan1Kevin M Prise2Queens University BelfastThe Northern Ireland Cancer CentreQueens University BelfastRadionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and subcellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumour cells will receive little or no direct radiation energy. There is now sufficient preclinical evidence of a bystander response which can modulate the biology of these unirradiated cells with current research demonstrating both protective and inhibitory responses. Dependence upon fraction of irradiated cells has also been found has and the presence of functional gap junctions appears to be import for several bystander responses. The selection of either high or low LET radionuclides may be critical. While low LET radionuclides appear to have a bystander response proportional to dose, the dose-response from high LET radionuclides are more complex. In media transfer experiments a U shaped response curve has been demonstrated for high LET treatments. However this U shaped response has not been seen with co-culture experiments and its relevance remains uncertain. For high LET treatments there is a suggestion that dose rate effects may also be important with inhibitory effects noted with 125I labelling study and a stimulatory seen with 123I labelling in one study.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215/fullBystander EffectRadiopharmaceuticalsradionuclideradioisotopetargeted alpha therapytargeted radionuclide therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darren eBrady
Joe M O'Sullivan
Kevin M Prise
spellingShingle Darren eBrady
Joe M O'Sullivan
Kevin M Prise
What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
Frontiers in Oncology
Bystander Effect
Radiopharmaceuticals
radionuclide
radioisotope
targeted alpha therapy
targeted radionuclide therapy
author_facet Darren eBrady
Joe M O'Sullivan
Kevin M Prise
author_sort Darren eBrady
title What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
title_short What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
title_full What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
title_fullStr What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
title_full_unstemmed What is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
title_sort what is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Radionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and subcellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumour cells will receive little or no direct radiation energy. There is now sufficient preclinical evidence of a bystander response which can modulate the biology of these unirradiated cells with current research demonstrating both protective and inhibitory responses. Dependence upon fraction of irradiated cells has also been found has and the presence of functional gap junctions appears to be import for several bystander responses. The selection of either high or low LET radionuclides may be critical. While low LET radionuclides appear to have a bystander response proportional to dose, the dose-response from high LET radionuclides are more complex. In media transfer experiments a U shaped response curve has been demonstrated for high LET treatments. However this U shaped response has not been seen with co-culture experiments and its relevance remains uncertain. For high LET treatments there is a suggestion that dose rate effects may also be important with inhibitory effects noted with 125I labelling study and a stimulatory seen with 123I labelling in one study.
topic Bystander Effect
Radiopharmaceuticals
radionuclide
radioisotope
targeted alpha therapy
targeted radionuclide therapy
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215/full
work_keys_str_mv AT darrenebrady whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies
AT joemosullivan whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies
AT kevinmprise whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies
_version_ 1724971756212453376