A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination

BACKGROUND: In this study we compared the sedative and amnesic effects of propofol with midazolam in cystoscopy examination.
 METHODS: This prospective clinical trial was done on 44 adults, with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I, II, III, who were candidate for cystoscopic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P Sajedi, A Yaraghi, L Niareisy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2006-07-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/316
id doaj-39101fa6d73e4b38ae0db18cc1f874f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39101fa6d73e4b38ae0db18cc1f874f32020-11-24T23:47:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362006-07-01113160163A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examinationP SajediA YaraghiL NiareisyBACKGROUND: In this study we compared the sedative and amnesic effects of propofol with midazolam in cystoscopy examination.
 METHODS: This prospective clinical trial was done on 44 adults, with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I, II, III, who were candidate for cystoscopic examination. Patients were recruited according to convenience sampling method and randomized into two equal groups. In study group, propofol plus fentanyl and in control group midazolam plus fentanyl were given intravenously. Vital signs and SaO2, the number of patients movements, presence of eyelid movements and verbal contact all at the first and 10th minutes after beginning the procedure were recorded. Also, frequency distributions of patients recalls, VAS (visual analog scale) for pain and VAS for satisfaction scores were evaluated in recovery room.
 RESULTS: Frequency distribution of patients movements, frequency distribution of verbal contact and eyelid movements at the first and 10th minutes were higher in midazolam group (P<0.05). There were a lower VAS pain score and higher VAS satisfaction score in propofol group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.041 respectively).
 CONCLUSIONS: Propofol was more effective than midazolam in inducing deep sedation and immobility in patients undergoing cystoscopy examination, without interfacing patients with additional danger.
 KEYWORDS: Propofol, midazolam, cystoscopy. http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/316
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P Sajedi
A Yaraghi
L Niareisy
spellingShingle P Sajedi
A Yaraghi
L Niareisy
A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
author_facet P Sajedi
A Yaraghi
L Niareisy
author_sort P Sajedi
title A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
title_short A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
title_full A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
title_fullStr A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
title_full_unstemmed A single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
title_sort single dose of propofol can produce excellent sedation and comparable amnesia with midazolam in cystoscopic examination
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2006-07-01
description BACKGROUND: In this study we compared the sedative and amnesic effects of propofol with midazolam in cystoscopy examination.
 METHODS: This prospective clinical trial was done on 44 adults, with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I, II, III, who were candidate for cystoscopic examination. Patients were recruited according to convenience sampling method and randomized into two equal groups. In study group, propofol plus fentanyl and in control group midazolam plus fentanyl were given intravenously. Vital signs and SaO2, the number of patients movements, presence of eyelid movements and verbal contact all at the first and 10th minutes after beginning the procedure were recorded. Also, frequency distributions of patients recalls, VAS (visual analog scale) for pain and VAS for satisfaction scores were evaluated in recovery room.
 RESULTS: Frequency distribution of patients movements, frequency distribution of verbal contact and eyelid movements at the first and 10th minutes were higher in midazolam group (P<0.05). There were a lower VAS pain score and higher VAS satisfaction score in propofol group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.041 respectively).
 CONCLUSIONS: Propofol was more effective than midazolam in inducing deep sedation and immobility in patients undergoing cystoscopy examination, without interfacing patients with additional danger.
 KEYWORDS: Propofol, midazolam, cystoscopy.
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/316
work_keys_str_mv AT psajedi asingledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
AT ayaraghi asingledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
AT lniareisy asingledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
AT psajedi singledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
AT ayaraghi singledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
AT lniareisy singledoseofpropofolcanproduceexcellentsedationandcomparableamnesiawithmidazolamincystoscopicexamination
_version_ 1725489539478192128