Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
Abstract Background Rapid reviews (RRs) are useful products to healthcare policy-makers and other stakeholders, who require timely evidence. Therefore, it is important to assess how well RRs convey useful information in a format that is easy to understand so that decision-makers can make best use of...
Main Authors: | Chantelle Garritty, Candyce Hamel, Mona Hersi, Claire Butler, Zarah Monfaredi, Adrienne Stevens, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Wei Cheng, David Moher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Health Research Policy and Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12961-020-00624-7 |
Similar Items
-
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
by: Chantelle Garritty, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
by: Lisa Affengruber, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Assessing the format and content of journal published and non-journal published rapid review reports: A comparative study.
by: Chantelle Garritty, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Health Planning for Indigenous Populations: A Rapid Evidence Review
by: David Loutfi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?
by: Gabriel Moore, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)