Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens

The basicranium has been described as phylogenetically informative, developmentally stable, and minimally affected by external factors and consequently plays an important role in cranial size and shape in subadult humans. Here basicranial variation of subadults from several modern human populations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepal H. Dalal, Heather F. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/324702
id doaj-390b0f35f6a645778885c19d0918f45c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-390b0f35f6a645778885c19d0918f45c2020-11-25T01:57:55ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/324702324702Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiensDeepal H. Dalal0Heather F. Smith1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USADepartment of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USAThe basicranium has been described as phylogenetically informative, developmentally stable, and minimally affected by external factors and consequently plays an important role in cranial size and shape in subadult humans. Here basicranial variation of subadults from several modern human populations was investigated and the impact of genetic relatedness on basicranial morphological similarities was investigated. Three-dimensional landmark data were digitized from subadult basicrania from seven populations. Published molecular data on short tandem repeats were statistically compared to morphological data from three ontogenetic stages. Basicranial and temporal bone morphology both reflect genetic distances in childhood and adolescence (5–18 years), but not in infancy (<5 years). The occipital bone reflects genetic distances only in adolescence (13–18 years). The sphenoid bone does not reflect genetic distances at any ontogenetic stage but was the most diagnostic region evaluated, resulting in high rates of correct classification among populations. These results suggest that the ontogenetic processes driving basicranial development are complex and cannot be succinctly summarized across populations or basicranial regions. However, the fact that certain regions reflect genetic distances suggests that the morphology of these regions may be useful in reconstructing population history in specimens for which direct DNA evidence is unavailable, such as archaeological sites.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/324702
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deepal H. Dalal
Heather F. Smith
spellingShingle Deepal H. Dalal
Heather F. Smith
Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
BioMed Research International
author_facet Deepal H. Dalal
Heather F. Smith
author_sort Deepal H. Dalal
title Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
title_short Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
title_full Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
title_fullStr Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
title_full_unstemmed Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens
title_sort developmental changes in morphology of the middle and posterior external cranial base in modern homo sapiens
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The basicranium has been described as phylogenetically informative, developmentally stable, and minimally affected by external factors and consequently plays an important role in cranial size and shape in subadult humans. Here basicranial variation of subadults from several modern human populations was investigated and the impact of genetic relatedness on basicranial morphological similarities was investigated. Three-dimensional landmark data were digitized from subadult basicrania from seven populations. Published molecular data on short tandem repeats were statistically compared to morphological data from three ontogenetic stages. Basicranial and temporal bone morphology both reflect genetic distances in childhood and adolescence (5–18 years), but not in infancy (<5 years). The occipital bone reflects genetic distances only in adolescence (13–18 years). The sphenoid bone does not reflect genetic distances at any ontogenetic stage but was the most diagnostic region evaluated, resulting in high rates of correct classification among populations. These results suggest that the ontogenetic processes driving basicranial development are complex and cannot be succinctly summarized across populations or basicranial regions. However, the fact that certain regions reflect genetic distances suggests that the morphology of these regions may be useful in reconstructing population history in specimens for which direct DNA evidence is unavailable, such as archaeological sites.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/324702
work_keys_str_mv AT deepalhdalal developmentalchangesinmorphologyofthemiddleandposteriorexternalcranialbaseinmodernhomosapiens
AT heatherfsmith developmentalchangesinmorphologyofthemiddleandposteriorexternalcranialbaseinmodernhomosapiens
_version_ 1724971753709502464