Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understandin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6 |
id |
doaj-3904f1cff0084b3b9453ee6c49928037 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3904f1cff0084b3b9453ee6c499280372020-12-06T12:16:59ZengSpringerOpenDisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research2662-23002019-12-011111810.1186/s43031-019-0017-6Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systemsRoss H. Nehm0Department of Ecology and Evolution, Institute for STEM Education, Stony Brook University (SUNY)Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understanding student thinking about living systems. A review of Concept Inventory (CI) research is used to illustrate how the absence of conceptual frameworks can complicate attempts to uncover student thinking about living systems and efforts to guide biology instruction. The review identifies possible starting points for the development of integrative cognitive and disciplinary frameworks for BER. First, relevant insights from developmental and cognitive psychology are reviewed and their connections are drawn to biology education. Second, prior theoretical work by biologists is highlighted as a starting point for re-integrating biology using discipline-focused frameworks. Specifically, three interdependent disciplinary themes are proposed as central to making sense of disciplinary core ideas: unity and diversity; randomness, probability, and contingency; and scale, hierarchy, and emergence. Overall, the review emphasizes that cognitive and conceptual grounding will help to foster much needed epistemic stability and guide the development of integrative empirical research agendas for BER.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6Biology education researchBiology educationDiscipline-based education researchConceptual frameworksCognitionLife science |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ross H. Nehm |
spellingShingle |
Ross H. Nehm Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research Biology education research Biology education Discipline-based education research Conceptual frameworks Cognition Life science |
author_facet |
Ross H. Nehm |
author_sort |
Ross H. Nehm |
title |
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
title_short |
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
title_full |
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
title_fullStr |
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
title_sort |
biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research |
issn |
2662-2300 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understanding student thinking about living systems. A review of Concept Inventory (CI) research is used to illustrate how the absence of conceptual frameworks can complicate attempts to uncover student thinking about living systems and efforts to guide biology instruction. The review identifies possible starting points for the development of integrative cognitive and disciplinary frameworks for BER. First, relevant insights from developmental and cognitive psychology are reviewed and their connections are drawn to biology education. Second, prior theoretical work by biologists is highlighted as a starting point for re-integrating biology using discipline-focused frameworks. Specifically, three interdependent disciplinary themes are proposed as central to making sense of disciplinary core ideas: unity and diversity; randomness, probability, and contingency; and scale, hierarchy, and emergence. Overall, the review emphasizes that cognitive and conceptual grounding will help to foster much needed epistemic stability and guide the development of integrative empirical research agendas for BER. |
topic |
Biology education research Biology education Discipline-based education research Conceptual frameworks Cognition Life science |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rosshnehm biologyeducationresearchbuildingintegrativeframeworksforteachingandlearningaboutlivingsystems |
_version_ |
1724399073379745792 |