Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems

Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understandin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ross H. Nehm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-12-01
Series:Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6
id doaj-3904f1cff0084b3b9453ee6c49928037
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3904f1cff0084b3b9453ee6c499280372020-12-06T12:16:59ZengSpringerOpenDisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research2662-23002019-12-011111810.1186/s43031-019-0017-6Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systemsRoss H. Nehm0Department of Ecology and Evolution, Institute for STEM Education, Stony Brook University (SUNY)Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understanding student thinking about living systems. A review of Concept Inventory (CI) research is used to illustrate how the absence of conceptual frameworks can complicate attempts to uncover student thinking about living systems and efforts to guide biology instruction. The review identifies possible starting points for the development of integrative cognitive and disciplinary frameworks for BER. First, relevant insights from developmental and cognitive psychology are reviewed and their connections are drawn to biology education. Second, prior theoretical work by biologists is highlighted as a starting point for re-integrating biology using discipline-focused frameworks. Specifically, three interdependent disciplinary themes are proposed as central to making sense of disciplinary core ideas: unity and diversity; randomness, probability, and contingency; and scale, hierarchy, and emergence. Overall, the review emphasizes that cognitive and conceptual grounding will help to foster much needed epistemic stability and guide the development of integrative empirical research agendas for BER.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6Biology education researchBiology educationDiscipline-based education researchConceptual frameworksCognitionLife science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ross H. Nehm
spellingShingle Ross H. Nehm
Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Biology education research
Biology education
Discipline-based education research
Conceptual frameworks
Cognition
Life science
author_facet Ross H. Nehm
author_sort Ross H. Nehm
title Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
title_short Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
title_full Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
title_fullStr Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
title_full_unstemmed Biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
title_sort biology education research: building integrative frameworks for teaching and learning about living systems
publisher SpringerOpen
series Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
issn 2662-2300
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract This critical review examines the challenges and opportunities facing the field of Biology Education Research (BER). Ongoing disciplinary fragmentation is identified as a force working in opposition to the development of unifying conceptual frameworks for living systems and for understanding student thinking about living systems. A review of Concept Inventory (CI) research is used to illustrate how the absence of conceptual frameworks can complicate attempts to uncover student thinking about living systems and efforts to guide biology instruction. The review identifies possible starting points for the development of integrative cognitive and disciplinary frameworks for BER. First, relevant insights from developmental and cognitive psychology are reviewed and their connections are drawn to biology education. Second, prior theoretical work by biologists is highlighted as a starting point for re-integrating biology using discipline-focused frameworks. Specifically, three interdependent disciplinary themes are proposed as central to making sense of disciplinary core ideas: unity and diversity; randomness, probability, and contingency; and scale, hierarchy, and emergence. Overall, the review emphasizes that cognitive and conceptual grounding will help to foster much needed epistemic stability and guide the development of integrative empirical research agendas for BER.
topic Biology education research
Biology education
Discipline-based education research
Conceptual frameworks
Cognition
Life science
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0017-6
work_keys_str_mv AT rosshnehm biologyeducationresearchbuildingintegrativeframeworksforteachingandlearningaboutlivingsystems
_version_ 1724399073379745792