Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches
The Dark Triad of personality has been associated with aggression against others as a reaction to perceived provocations. However, previous work has also shown that such responsive aggression even occurs if it means harming oneself. The first of two laboratory studies aimed to investigate whether th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3941 |
id |
doaj-38fb755ea80c401c99e79cd3159dd156 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-38fb755ea80c401c99e79cd3159dd1562021-04-09T23:00:41ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-04-01183941394110.3390/ijerph18083941Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory ApproachesLena Lämmle0Matthias Ziegler1Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Faculty of Human Sciences, MSH Medical School Hamburg, 20457 Hamburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, GermanyThe Dark Triad of personality has been associated with aggression against others as a reaction to perceived provocations. However, previous work has also shown that such responsive aggression even occurs if it means harming oneself. The first of two laboratory studies aimed to investigate whether this relation between the Dark Triad and self-harming behavior also occurs in situations where no others are affected but self-harm is likely. The second laboratory study considered two different settings in a within-participants design in order to analyze the stability of self-harming behavior and to what extent the Dark Triad constructs influence this behavior. The sample for study 1 consisted of 151 students (45.7% female) with a mean age of 21.40 years (<i>SD</i> = 2.19); the sample for study 2 consisted of 251 students (76.0% female) with a mean age of 22.21 years (<i>SD</i> = 3.90). Aside from the Dark Triad’s common core, depending on how self-harm was triggered (ego-threat (mainly narcissism), being alone with one’s own thoughts (mainly psychopathy), or reward condition (mainly Machiavellianism)), the Dark Triad traits differed in their responsiveness but were stable over the last two conditions, thereby suggesting a vulnerable side of the Dark Triad.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3941Dark Triaddeliberate self-harmvulnerabilitywhite noiseelectric shocks |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lena Lämmle Matthias Ziegler |
spellingShingle |
Lena Lämmle Matthias Ziegler Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Dark Triad deliberate self-harm vulnerability white noise electric shocks |
author_facet |
Lena Lämmle Matthias Ziegler |
author_sort |
Lena Lämmle |
title |
Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches |
title_short |
Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches |
title_full |
Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches |
title_fullStr |
Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Our Vulnerable Dark Side—Two Laboratory Approaches |
title_sort |
our vulnerable dark side—two laboratory approaches |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The Dark Triad of personality has been associated with aggression against others as a reaction to perceived provocations. However, previous work has also shown that such responsive aggression even occurs if it means harming oneself. The first of two laboratory studies aimed to investigate whether this relation between the Dark Triad and self-harming behavior also occurs in situations where no others are affected but self-harm is likely. The second laboratory study considered two different settings in a within-participants design in order to analyze the stability of self-harming behavior and to what extent the Dark Triad constructs influence this behavior. The sample for study 1 consisted of 151 students (45.7% female) with a mean age of 21.40 years (<i>SD</i> = 2.19); the sample for study 2 consisted of 251 students (76.0% female) with a mean age of 22.21 years (<i>SD</i> = 3.90). Aside from the Dark Triad’s common core, depending on how self-harm was triggered (ego-threat (mainly narcissism), being alone with one’s own thoughts (mainly psychopathy), or reward condition (mainly Machiavellianism)), the Dark Triad traits differed in their responsiveness but were stable over the last two conditions, thereby suggesting a vulnerable side of the Dark Triad. |
topic |
Dark Triad deliberate self-harm vulnerability white noise electric shocks |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/3941 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lenalammle ourvulnerabledarksidetwolaboratoryapproaches AT matthiasziegler ourvulnerabledarksidetwolaboratoryapproaches |
_version_ |
1721532280489377792 |