The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics

Objective. The objective of this study was to determine if the smile would influence the facial types esthetics perception for dentists, specialists, and laypeople. The null hypotheses for this study were that the smile has no effect on the perceived facial esthetics of different facial types. Mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Waeil Batwa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3562916
id doaj-38d3dca24d4c46da8c8ed3b9d667991f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38d3dca24d4c46da8c8ed3b9d667991f2020-11-24T20:45:57ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412018-01-01201810.1155/2018/35629163562916The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type EstheticsWaeil Batwa0Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaObjective. The objective of this study was to determine if the smile would influence the facial types esthetics perception for dentists, specialists, and laypeople. The null hypotheses for this study were that the smile has no effect on the perceived facial esthetics of different facial types. Materials and Method. A photograph of an attractive female face with an attractive smile was captured and manipulated using computer software, which was used to produce changes in the smile and facial type of the female face. Two sets of photographs were developed. The first set is composed of three photos showing mesofacial, dolichofacial, and brachyfacial faces; on these photos the smiles were masked intentionally. On the second set, the smile was revealed in the three face types (mesofacial, dolichofacial, and brachyfacial faces); this results in three smiling photos, where each showed a facial type with the same smile. These photos (6 photos in total) were rated by the participants; two hundred participants were recruited, 50 general dentists, 50 specialist dentists, and 100 laypeople. Results. The three groups (dentists, specialists, and laypeople) rated the mesofacial face as the highest (p value < 0.01) (64.48, 76.12, and 60.68, respectively), the mesofacial face was the only face that showed a significant difference between the three groups ratings (p value<0.01), and this significant difference disappeared when we compared the smiling photos for the mesofacial face (p value>0.01). Conclusion. Mesofacial face is considered to be the most attractive face in comparison to dolichofacial and brachyfacial faces. Facial type should not be looked at separately from the smile as the smile might influence the esthetics perception of the facial type.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3562916
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Waeil Batwa
spellingShingle Waeil Batwa
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
BioMed Research International
author_facet Waeil Batwa
author_sort Waeil Batwa
title The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
title_short The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
title_full The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
title_fullStr The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics
title_sort influence of the smile on the perceived facial type esthetics
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objective. The objective of this study was to determine if the smile would influence the facial types esthetics perception for dentists, specialists, and laypeople. The null hypotheses for this study were that the smile has no effect on the perceived facial esthetics of different facial types. Materials and Method. A photograph of an attractive female face with an attractive smile was captured and manipulated using computer software, which was used to produce changes in the smile and facial type of the female face. Two sets of photographs were developed. The first set is composed of three photos showing mesofacial, dolichofacial, and brachyfacial faces; on these photos the smiles were masked intentionally. On the second set, the smile was revealed in the three face types (mesofacial, dolichofacial, and brachyfacial faces); this results in three smiling photos, where each showed a facial type with the same smile. These photos (6 photos in total) were rated by the participants; two hundred participants were recruited, 50 general dentists, 50 specialist dentists, and 100 laypeople. Results. The three groups (dentists, specialists, and laypeople) rated the mesofacial face as the highest (p value < 0.01) (64.48, 76.12, and 60.68, respectively), the mesofacial face was the only face that showed a significant difference between the three groups ratings (p value<0.01), and this significant difference disappeared when we compared the smiling photos for the mesofacial face (p value>0.01). Conclusion. Mesofacial face is considered to be the most attractive face in comparison to dolichofacial and brachyfacial faces. Facial type should not be looked at separately from the smile as the smile might influence the esthetics perception of the facial type.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3562916
work_keys_str_mv AT waeilbatwa theinfluenceofthesmileontheperceivedfacialtypeesthetics
AT waeilbatwa influenceofthesmileontheperceivedfacialtypeesthetics
_version_ 1716813576250851328